Designing citizen science tools for learning: lessons learnt from the iterative development of nQuire
Open Access
- 11 May 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning
- Vol. 13 (1), 1-23
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-018-0072-1
Abstract
This paper reports on a 4-year research and development case study about the design of citizen science tools for inquiry learning. It details the process of iterative pedagogy-led design and evaluation of the nQuire toolkit, a set of web-based and mobile tools scaffolding the creation of online citizen science investigations. The design involved an expert review of inquiry learning and citizen science, combined with user experience studies involving more than 200 users. These have informed a concept that we have termed ‘citizen inquiry’, which engages members of the public alongside scientists in setting up, running, managing or contributing to citizen science projects with a main aim of learning about the scientific method through doing science by interaction with others. A design-based research (DBR) methodology was adopted for the iterative design and evaluation of citizen science tools. DBR was focused on the refinement of a central concept, ‘citizen inquiry’, by exploring how it can be instantiated in educational technologies and interventions. The empirical evaluation and iteration of technologies involved three design experiments with end users, user interviews, and insights from pedagogy and user experience experts. Evidence from the iterative development of nQuire led to the production of a set of interaction design principles that aim to guide the development of online, learning-centred, citizen science projects. Eight design guidelines are proposed: users as producers of knowledge, topics before tools, mobile affordances, scaffolds to the process of scientific inquiry, learning by doing as key message, being part of a community as key message, every visit brings a reward, and value users and their time.Keywords
Funding Information
- Nominet Trust
- BBC-OU development grant
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Process, Not Product: Investigating Recommendations for Improving Citizen Science “Success”PLOS ONE, 2013
- Public Participation in Scientific Research: a Framework for Deliberate DesignEcology and Society, 2012
- Creating Personal Meaning through Technology-Supported Science Inquiry Learning across Formal and Informal SettingsInternational Journal of Science Education, 2012
- A new dawn for citizen scienceTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 2009
- Technological Advances in Inquiry LearningScience, 2006
- Toward implementing distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science from designJournal of Research in Science Teaching, 2005
- A Scaffolding Design Framework for Software to Support Science InquiryJournal of the Learning Sciences, 2004
- Design Research: What We Learn When We Engage in DesignJournal of the Learning Sciences, 2002
- Addressing the Challenges of Inquiry-Based Learning Through Technology and Curriculum DesignJournal of the Learning Sciences, 1999
- Improving a human-computer dialogueCommunications of the ACM, 1990