Egalitarian motives in humans
- 1 April 2007
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Nature
- Vol. 446 (7137), 794-796
- https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05651
Abstract
Participants in laboratory games are often willing to alter others' incomes at a cost to themselves, and this behaviour has the effect of promoting cooperation1, 2, 3. What motivates this action is unclear: punishment and reward aimed at promoting cooperation cannot be distinguished from attempts to produce equality4. To understand costly taking and costly giving, we create an experimental game that isolates egalitarian motives. The results show that subjects reduce and augment others’ incomes, at a personal cost, even when there is no cooperative behaviour to be reinforced. Furthermore, the size and frequency of income alterations are strongly influenced by inequality. Emotions towards top earners become increasingly negative as inequality increases, and those who express these emotions spend more to reduce above-average earners' incomes and to increase below-average earners' incomes. The results suggest that egalitarian motives affect income-altering behaviours, and may therefore be an important factor underlying the evolution of strong reciprocity5 and, hence, cooperation in humans.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- A theory of reciprocityGames and Economic Behavior, 2006
- Driving Forces Behind Informal SanctionsEconometrica, 2005
- Egalitarian motive and altruistic punishmentNature, 2005
- The Carrot or the Stick: Rewards, Punishments, and CooperationAmerican Economic Review, 2003
- Strong reciprocity, human cooperation, and the enforcement of social normsHuman Nature, 2002
- Altruistic punishment in humansNature, 2002
- ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and CompetitionAmerican Economic Review, 2000
- A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and CooperationThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1999
- The Logic of Animal ConflictNature, 1973
- On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications.American Psychologist, 1962