The N400 and Late Positive Complex (LPC) Effects Reflect Controlled Rather than Automatic Mechanisms of Sentence Processing
Open Access
- 14 August 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Brain Sciences
- Vol. 2 (3), 267-297
- https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci2030267
Abstract
This study compared automatic and controlled cognitive processes that underlie event-related potentials (ERPs) effects during speech perception. Sentences were presented to French native speakers, and the final word could be congruent or incongruent, and presented at one of four levels of degradation (using a modulation with pink noise): no degradation, mild degradation (2 levels), or strong degradation. We assumed that degradation impairs controlled more than automatic processes. The N400 and Late Positive Complex (LPC) effects were defined as the differences between the corresponding wave amplitudes to incongruent words minus congruent words. Under mild degradation, where controlled sentence-level processing could still occur (as indicated by behavioral data), both N400 and LPC effects were delayed and the latter effect was reduced. Under strong degradation, where sentence processing was rather automatic (as indicated by behavioral data), no ERP effect remained. These results suggest that ERP effects elicited in complex contexts, such as sentences, reflect controlled rather than automatic mechanisms of speech processing. These results differ from the results of experiments that used word-pair or word-list paradigms.This publication has 86 references indexed in Scilit:
- Working Memory Is Partially Preserved during SleepPLOS ONE, 2012
- Human evoked cortical activity to signal-to-noise ratio and absolute signal levelHearing Research, 2009
- Thinking ahead: The role and roots of prediction in language comprehensionPsychophysiology, 2007
- The effects of prime visibility on ERP measures of masked primingCognitive Brain Research, 2005
- Mechanisms of unconscious priming: I. Response competition, not spreading activation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2000
- The automaticity of interpreting Automaticity.American Psychologist, 2000
- AUTOMATICITY AND READING: PERSPECTIVES FROM THE INSTANCE THEORY OF AUTOMATIZATIONReading & Writing Quarterly, 1997
- Dissimilar age influences on two ERP waveforms (LPC and N400) reflecting semantic context effectCognitive Brain Research, 1996
- Semantic priming, prime reportability, and retroactive priming are interdependentMemory & Cognition, 1988
- Retroactive Semantic Priming in a Lexical Decision TaskThe Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 1988