Forehead SpO2 monitoring compared to finger SpO2 recording in emergency transport
- 16 March 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Anaesthesia
- Vol. 59 (4), 390-393
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03673.x
Abstract
Continuous peripheral oxygen saturation monitoring using a finger pulse oximeter is standard in prehospital emergency medicine. Forehead peripheral oxygen saturation monitoring has been enhanced for better performance during movement and in cold ambient temperatures, both of which are common during emergency transport. We compared a new forehead monitor with standard finger pulse oximeter. The forehead technique had significantly fewer mean (SD) alarms per patient (3.0 (2.2)) than the finger pulse oximeter (7.8 (4.0)) and shorter durations of malfunction (76 (60) s compared to 333 (170) s) when using the finger pulse oximeter. We conclude that measuring peripheral oxygen saturation monitoring with a forehead sensor provides better monitoring quality in emergency care.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Influence of Active Warming on Signal Quality of Pulse Oximetry in Prehospital Trauma CareAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2002
- Mild Perioperative HypothermiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Postoperative hemodynamic and thermoregulatory consequences of intraoperative core hypothermiaJournal of Clinical Anesthesia, 1995
- Accuracy of three pulse oximeters at low cardiac index and peripheral temperatureCritical Care Medicine, 1991
- COMPARISON OF PULSE OXIMETERS: ACCURACY AT LOW ARTERIAL PRESSURE IN VOLUNTEERSBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1990
- Pulse oximetry at the roadside: a study of pulse oximetry in immediate care.BMJ, 1989
- Pulse oximetry: Analysis of theory, technology, and practiceJournal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 1988
- Pulse oximetry and postoperative hypothermiaAnaesthesia, 1988
- Blood Flow Limits and Pulse Oximeter Signal DetectionAnesthesiology, 1987
- Evaluation of Pulse OximetryAnesthesiology, 1983