Design considerations and coil comparisons for 7 T brain imaging
- 1 March 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Applied Magnetic Resonance
- Vol. 29 (1), 19
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03166954
Abstract
The development of 300 MHz radio-frequency (RF) head coils analogous to those used at field strengths of 1.5 and 3 T is complicated by increased dissipative losses in conductive tissue, effects arising from the short RF wavelength in biological tissue (about 13 cm at 300 MHz), and the constraints imposed by the use of head gradient sets desirable for mitigating increased static field susceptibility effects. In this study, five RF head coils were constructed and tested on a 7 T scanner including 2 TEM designs, 2 birdcage designs and a local receive-only array. Signal-to-noise ratio, coil reception profiles and interactions between the coil and dielectric head were examined. Particular attention was placed on the coil’s reception in the neck and shoulders, where the head gradient is unable to spatially encode the image. With the use of conductive shields and distributed capacitance, all of the coil designs could be made to image effectively at high field, but each design was found to have subtle differences in field distribution, interaction with the dielectric boundary conditions of the head and fringe fields in the neck and shoulders. In particular, the birdcage and array coils were found to have reducedB 1 reception field profiles in the neck and shoulders which helped reduce signal detection outside the linear region of the head gradient coil. Although the TEM coils exhibited higher signal detection in the neck and shoulders, all the coils picked up enough signal from these regions to produce artifacts in the brain. These artifacts could be mitigated through use of a conductive shield or by small local dephasing shims sewn into the shoulders of a jacket worn by the subject. Although homogeneous in low-dielectric-constant phantoms, the volume coil’sB 1 profile was strongly peaked in the center of the head, rendering them spatially complementary to that observed in the surface coil array. The image profile of the surface coil was found to be less dramatically changed from patterns observed at lower field strength. Its dielectric brightening pattern was found to depend on the orientation of the coil with respect to the head.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Numerical Analysis of Radio-Frequency Power Requirements in Magnetic Resonance Imaging ExperimentIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 2004
- Detunable transverse electromagnetic (TEM) volume coil for high‐field NMRMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2002
- Signal‐to‐noise ratio and absorbed power as functions of main magnetic field strength, and definition of “90°” RF pulse for the head in the birdcage coilMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2001
- SAR and B1 field distributions in a heterogeneous human head model within a birdcage coilMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1998
- Phased array detectors and an automated intensity‐correction algorithm for high‐resolution MR imaging of the human brainMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1995
- High frequency volume coils for clinical NMR imaging and spectroscopyMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1994
- Electromagnetic fields of surface coil in vivo NMR at high frequenciesMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1991
- The NMR phased arrayMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1990
- Radiofrequency penetration and absorption in the human body: Limitations to high‐field whole‐body nuclear magnetic resonance imagingMedical Physics, 1987
- The field dependence of NMR imaging. II. Arguments concerning an optimal field strengthMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1986