Which specific modes of exercise training are most effective for treating low back pain? Network meta-analysis
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 19 October 2019
- journal article
- review article
- Published by BMJ in British Journal of Sports Medicine
- Vol. 54 (21), 1279-1287
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2019-100886
Abstract
Objective Examine the effectiveness of specific modes of exercise training in non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP). Design Network meta-analysis (NMA). Data sources MEDLINE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, EMBASE, CENTRAL. Eligibility criteria Exercise training randomised controlled/clinical trials in adults with NSCLBP. Results Among 9543 records, 89 studies (patients=5578) were eligible for qualitative synthesis and 70 (pain), 63 (physical function), 16 (mental health) and 4 (trunk muscle strength) for NMA. The NMA consistency model revealed that the following exercise training modalities had the highest probability (surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA)) of being best when compared with true control: Pilates for pain (SUCRA=100%; pooled standardised mean difference (95% CI): −1.86 (–2.54 to –1.19)), resistance (SUCRA=80%; −1.14 (–1.71 to –0.56)) and stabilisation/motor control (SUCRA=80%; −1.13 (–1.53 to –0.74)) for physical function and resistance (SUCRA=80%; −1.26 (–2.10 to –0.41)) and aerobic (SUCRA=80%; −1.18 (–2.20 to –0.15)) for mental health. True control was most likely (SUCRA≤10%) to be the worst treatment for all outcomes, followed by therapist hands-off control for pain (SUCRA=10%; 0.09 (–0.71 to 0.89)) and physical function (SUCRA=20%; −0.31 (–0.94 to 0.32)) and therapist hands-on control for mental health (SUCRA=20%; −0.31 (–1.31 to 0.70)). Stretching and McKenzie exercise effect sizes did not differ to true control for pain or function (p>0.095; SUCRASummary/conclusion There is low quality evidence that Pilates, stabilisation/motor control, resistance training and aerobic exercise training are the most effective treatments, pending outcome of interest, for adults with NSCLBP. Exercise training may also be more effective than therapist hands-on treatment. Heterogeneity among studies and the fact that there are few studies with low risk of bias are both limitations.Keywords
Funding Information
- Musculoskeletal Australia (CONTR2017/00399)
This publication has 145 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Yoga for Low Back PainThe Clinical Journal of Pain, 2013
- Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010The Lancet, 2013
- Clinical Pilates versus General Exercise for Chronic Low Back PainMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2012
- The Burden of Chronic Low Back PainSpine, 2012
- Defining Pilates exercise: A systematic reviewComplementary Therapies in Medicine, 2012
- A Randomized Trial Comparing Yoga, Stretching, and a Self-care Book for Chronic Low Back PainJAMA Internal Medicine, 2011
- Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low-back painCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2011
- An updated overview of clinical guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary careEuropean Spine Journal, 2010
- Exercise therapy for chronic nonspecific low-back painBest Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, 2010
- Chapter 3 European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary careEuropean Spine Journal, 2006