The impact on health‐related quality of life of stress, urge and mixed urinary incontinence
- 27 October 2003
- journal article
- website
- Published by Wiley in BJU International
- Vol. 92 (7), 731-735
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.2003.04463.x
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the impact of each type of urinary incontinence (stress, urge, and mixed) on health‐related quality of life (HRQL). SUBJECTS AND METHODS The USA National Overactive Bladder Evaluation (NOBLE) programme of prevalence was used to identify respondents with incontinence based upon telephone survey responses. A nested case‐control study was then conducted on respondents with symptoms of an overactive bladder (OAB), and on age and gender‐matched controls; this consisted of the respondents completing a series of questionnaires, including the OAB‐q (an HRQL scale for OAB), the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Short‐Form‐36 (SF‐36), the MOS Sleep Scale, and the Center for Epidemiological Studies ‐ Depression (CES‐D) scale. Respondents were categorized into subgroups according to the primary cause of urine loss, i.e. sudden/uncomfortable urge to urinate (urge, UI), physical pressure (stress, SI), or both (mixed, MI). Descriptive analyses, t‐tests and analysis of variance with post hoc comparisons were used. RESULTS Of the 919 participants in the nested case‐control study, 171 reported incontinence, i.e. UI (69), SI (62) and MI (40). Among this cohort, 82.5% were female, 85.4% were Caucasian and the population had a mean age of 55.9 years. All OAB‐q subscale scores were significantly (P < 0.01) worse among those with MI than with SI. Respondents with UI reported significantly higher levels of symptom bother and lower sleep scores (both P < 0.001) than those with SI. There were no differences in HRQL between the MI and UI groups. Voiding frequency and nocturia episodes did not differ among the groups but compared with the SI group, both UI and MI groups reported significantly higher ratings of urinary urge intensity (P < 0.001) and rated their need for medical care significantly higher (P < 0.01). The MI group reported more incontinence episodes (P = 0.02) than the SI group. CONCLUSION Compared with SI, respondents with UI and MI reported not only significantly greater ratings of urinary urge intensity and more incontinence episodes, but also significantly worse HRQL. These results are consistent with previous findings which indicated a greater impact on HRQL for the urge component of MI than for the stress component.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Impact of Urinary Urgency and Frequency on Health-Related Quality of Life in Overactive Bladder: Results from a National Community SurveyValue in Health, 2004
- The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: Report from the standardisation sub‐committee of the International Continence SocietyNeurourology and Urodynamics, 2002
- The prevalence of urinary incontinence and its influence on the quality of life in women from an urban Swedish populationActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1999
- Urinary incontinence in Northern Ireland: a prevalence studyBJU International, 1999
- Quality‐of‐life aspects of the overactive bladder and the effect of treatment with tolterodineBJU International, 1999
- Urge IncontinencePharmacoEconomics, 1998
- A Review of the Quality-of-Life Aspects of Urinary Urge IncontinencePharmacoEconomics, 1996
- The Influence of Urinary Incontinence on the Quality of Life of Elderly WomenAge and Ageing, 1993
- The Quality of Life in Women with Urinary Incontinence as Measured by the Sickness Impact ProfileJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1991
- Distress and delay associated with urinary incontinence, frequency, and urgency in women.BMJ, 1988