Caesarean section: the paradox
- 1 October 2006
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier BV in The Lancet
- Vol. 368 (9546), 1472-1473
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69616-5
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Socioeconomic differentials in caesarean rates in developing countries: a retrospective analysisThe Lancet, 2006
- Risks of Patient Choice CesareanBirth, 2006
- Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin AmericaThe Lancet, 2006
- The challenge of reducing neonatal mortality in middle-income countries: findings from three Brazilian birth cohorts in 1982, 1993, and 2004The Lancet, 2005
- Evidence-based, cost-effective interventions: how many newborn babies can we save?The Lancet, 2005
- Mandatory second opinion to reduce rates of unnecessary caesarean sections in Latin America: a cluster randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2004
- Need for caesarean sections in west AfricaThe Lancet, 2002
- Need for caesarean sections in west AfricaThe Lancet, 2002
- Caesarean section rate for maternal indication in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic reviewThe Lancet, 2001
- Rates and implications of caesarean sections in Latin America: ecological study Commentary: all women should have a choice Commentary: increase in caesarean sections may reflect medical control not women's choice Commentary: "health has become secondary to a sexually attractive body"BMJ, 1999