Metabarcoding a diverse arthropod mock community
Open Access
- 18 February 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Molecular Ecology Resources
- Vol. 19 (3), 711-727
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13008
Abstract
Although DNA metabarcoding is an attractive approach for monitoring biodiversity, it is often difficult to detect all the species present in a bulk sample. In particular, sequence recovery for a given species depends on its biomass and mitome copy number as well as the primer set employed for PCR. To examine these variables, we constructed a mock community of terrestrial arthropods comprised of 374 species. We used this community to examine how species recovery was impacted when amplicon pools were constructed in four ways. The first two protocols involved the construction of bulk DNA extracts from different body segments (Bulk Abdomen, Bulk Leg). The other protocols involved the production of DNA extracts from single legs which were then merged prior to PCR (Composite Leg) or PCR‐amplified separately (Single Leg) and then pooled. The amplicons generated by these four treatments were then sequenced on three platforms (Illumina MiSeq, Ion Torrent PGM, Ion Torrent S5). The choice of sequencing platform did not substantially influence species recovery, although the Miseq delivered the highest sequence quality. As expected, species recovery was most efficient from the Single Leg treatment because amplicon abundance varied little among taxa. Among the three treatments where PCR occurred after pooling, the Bulk Abdomen treatment produced a more uniform read abundance than the Bulk Leg or Composite Leg treatment. Primer choice also influenced species recovery and evenness. Our results reveal how variation in protocols can have substantial impacts on perceived diversity unless sequencing coverage is sufficient to reach an asymptote.Keywords
Funding Information
- Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science
This publication has 83 references indexed in Scilit:
- A DNA-Based Registry for All Animal Species: The Barcode Index Number (BIN) SystemPLOS ONE, 2013
- Wolbachia and DNA Barcoding Insects: Patterns, Potential, and ProblemsPLOS ONE, 2012
- The Effect of Geographical Scale of Sampling on DNA BarcodingSystematic Biology, 2012
- Length and GC-biases during sequencing library amplification: A comparison of various polymerase-buffer systems with ancient and modern DNA sequencing librariesBioTechniques, 2012
- Assessing biodiversity of a freshwater benthic macroinvertebrate community through non-destructive environmental barcoding of DNA from preservative ethanolBMC Ecology, 2012
- The Composite Insect Trap: An Innovative Combination Trap for Biologically Diverse SamplingPLOS ONE, 2011
- Environmental Barcoding: A Next-Generation Sequencing Approach for Biomonitoring Applications Using River BenthosPLOS ONE, 2011
- QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing dataNature Methods, 2010
- Many species in one: DNA barcoding overestimates the number of species when nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes are coamplifiedProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008
- A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequencesJournal of Molecular Evolution, 1980