Commentary: Understanding the origins of anger, contempt, and disgust in public health policy disputes: Applying moral psychology to harm reduction debates
- 4 March 2010
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Journal of Public Health Policy
- Vol. 31 (1), 1-16
- https://doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2009.52
Abstract
JPHP provides a medium for publication of scholarly articles on the epidemiologic and social foundations of public health policy; presents the results of research bearing on such policy; evaluates administrative experience in the implementation of specific public health policies and programs; and helps make more effective the services provided by health departments, other health agencies, and public health workers in protecting and improving the health of the public.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Medical Accuracy in Sexuality Education: Ideology and the Scientific ProcessAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2008
- The proposed tobacco regulation: the triumph of hope over experience?Tobacco Control, 2008
- SMOKELESS TOBACCO: HARM REDUCTION DEBATABLECA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2008
- The New Synthesis in Moral PsychologyScience, 2007
- Intuitive ethics: how innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtuesPublished by MIT Press ,2004
- First, tell the truth: a dialogue on human rights, deception, and the use of smokeless tobacco as a substitute for cigarettesTobacco Control, 2003
- Epidemiology and the politics of needle exchangeAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2000
- The Moralization of Cigarette Smoking in the United StatesJournal of Consumer Psychology, 1999
- The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity).Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1999
- The Moral Judgment of the ChildPublished by University of Illinois Press ,1935