Social Practice, Method, and Some Problems of Field Archaeology
- 1 July 2003
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Antiquity
- Vol. 68 (3), 421-434
- https://doi.org/10.2307/3557102
Abstract
This article argues that the development of excavation field methods in archaeology is closely tied to the social position of fieldworkers. We also note disaffection in field contract archaeology today resulting from a wide range of factors, including the separation of excavation from interpretation. We argue that this separation and the notion that archaeological excavation can be seen as unskilled undermine the scientific basis of archaeology. A reflexive archaeology is discussed that empowers field archaeology by (a) focusing interpretation at the trowel's edge, (b) bringing multiple perspectives close to the moment of excavation, and (c) documenting the documentation process.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Swedish Archaeology in Perspective and the Possibility of ReflexivityCurrent Swedish Archaeology, 2021
- Destruction and the Rhetoric of ExcavationNorwegian Archaeological Review, 2001
- Interpretation not record: the practice of archaeologyAntiquity, 2000
- Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledgeTheory, Culture & Society, 2000
- Class confrontations in archaeologyHistorical Archaeology, 1999
- The New History in an Old MuseumPublished by Duke University Press ,1997
- Preliminary investigations and cognitive considerations of the acoustical resonances of selected archaeological sitesAntiquity, 1996
- Toward a Critical Archaeology [and Comments and Reply]Current Anthropology, 1987
- Is There an Archaeological Record?Published by Elsevier BV ,1985
- Archaeology and the StateAntiquity, 1934