iCCM policy analysis: strategic contributions to understanding its character, design and scale up in sub-Saharan Africa
Open Access
- 29 October 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Health Policy and Planning
- Vol. 30 (suppl 2), ii3-ii11
- https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czv096
Abstract
Pneumonia, diarrhoea and malaria remain leading causes of death for children under 5 years of age and access to effective and appropriate treatment for sick children is extremely low where it is needed most. Integrated community case management (iCCM) enables community health workers to provide basic lifesaving treatment for sick children living in remote communities for these diseases. While many governments in sub-Saharan Africa recently changed policies to support iCCM, large variations in implementation remain. As a result, the collaboration represented in this supplement examined the policy processes underpinning iCCM through qualitative case study research in six purposively identified countries (Niger, Burkina Faso, Mali, Kenya, Malawi and Mozambique) and the global context. We introduce the supplement, by reviewing how policy analysis can inform: (a) how we frame iCCM and negotiate its boundaries, (b) how we tailor iCCM for national health systems and (c) how we foster accountability and learning for iCCM. In terms of framing, iCCM boundaries reflect how an array of actors use evidence to prioritize particular aspects of child mortality (lack of access to treatment), and how this underpins the ability to reach consensus and legitimate specific policy enterprises. When promoted at national level, contextual health system factors, such as the profile of CHWs and the history of primary health care, cannot be ignored. Adaptation to these contextual realities may lead to unintended consequences not forseen by technical or managerial expertize alone. Further scaling up of iCCM requires understanding of the political accountabilities involved, how ownership can be fostered and learning for improved policies and programs sustained. Collectively these articles demonstrate that iCCM, although often compartmentalized as a technical intervention, also reflects the larger and messier real world of health politics, policy and practice, for which policy analysis is vital, as an integral component of public health programming.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Epistemic communities in global health and the development of child survival policy: a case study of iCCMHealth Policy and Planning, 2015
- Relaunch of the official community health worker programme in Mozambique: is there a sustainable basis for iCCM policy?Health Policy and Planning, 2015
- Assessing the impact of integrated community case management (iCCM) programs on child mortality: Review of early results and lessons learned in sub–Saharan AfricaJournal of Global Health, 2014
- Stakeholders' Perceptions of Integrated Community Case Management by Community Health Workers: A Post-Intervention Qualitative StudyPLOS ONE, 2014
- Policy challenges facing integrated community case management in Sub‐Saharan AfricaTropical Medicine & International Health, 2014
- New vaccine adoption: qualitative study of national decision-making processes in seven low- and middle-income countriesHealth Policy and Planning, 2012
- Integrated management of childhood illness: what have we learned and how can it be improved?Archives of Disease in Childhood, 2012
- Policy development in malaria vector management in Mozambique, South Africa and ZimbabweHealth Policy and Planning, 2010
- Effect of the Integrated Management of Childhood Illness strategy on childhood mortality and nutrition in a rural area in Bangladesh: a cluster randomised trialThe Lancet, 2009
- Community-based health workers: Head start or false start towards health for all?Social Science & Medicine, 1987