Which studies test whether self‐enhancement is pancultural? Reply to Sedikides, Gaertner, and Vevea, 2007
- 7 August 2007
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Asian Journal of Social Psychology
- Vol. 10 (3), 198-200
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839x.2007.00226.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Inclusion of theory‐relevant moderators yield the same conclusions as Sedikides, Gaertner, and Vevea (2005): A meta‐analytical reply to Heine, Kitayama, and Hamamura (2007)Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2007
- Pancultural self-enhancement reloaded: A meta-analytic reply to Heine (2005).Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2005
- Where Is the Evidence for Pancultural Self-Enhancement? A Reply to Sedikides, Gaertner, and Toguchi (2003).Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2005
- Biases in Social Comparative Judgments: The Role of Nonmotivated Factors in Above-Average and Comparative-Optimism Effects.Psychological Bulletin, 2004
- Interjudge Agreement, Self-Enhancement, and Liking: Cross-Cultural DivergencesPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2002
- Divergent consequences of success and failure in Japan and North America: An investigation of self-improving motivations and malleable selves.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001
- Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997
- No one in my group can be below the group's average: A robust positivity bias in favor of anonymous peers.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997
- No one in my group can be below the group's average: A robust positivity bias in favor of anonymous peers.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997