Practical guidelines for assessing power and false discovery rate for a fixed sample size in microarray experiments
- 12 March 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 27 (11), 1960-1972
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3237
Abstract
One major goal in microarray studies is to identify genes having different expression levels across different classes/conditions. In order to achieve this goal, a study needs to have an adequate sample size to ensure the desired power. Owing to the importance of this topic, a number of approaches to sample size calculation have been developed. However, due to the cost and/or experimental difficulties in obtaining sufficient biological materials, it might be difficult to attain the required sample size. In this article, we address more practical questions for assessing power and false discovery rate (FDR) for a fixed sample size. The relationships between power, sample size and FDR are explored. We also conduct simulations and a real data study to evaluate the proposed findings. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Approximate Sample Size Calculations with Microarray Data: An IllustrationStatistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 2006
- Sample size determination for the false discovery rateBioinformatics, 2005
- Practical FDR-based sample size calculations in microarray experimentsBioinformatics, 2005
- Sample size for FDR-control in microarray data analysisBioinformatics, 2005
- Sample size for gene expression microarray experimentsBioinformatics, 2004
- Error-Rate and Decision-Theoretic Methods of Multiple Testing: Which Genes Have High Objective Probabilities of Differential Expression?Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 2004
- Microarray experimental design: power and sample size considerationsPhysiological Genomics, 2003
- Comparing three methods for variance estimation with duplicated high density oligonucleotide arraysFunctional & Integrative Genomics, 2002
- A Direct Approach to False Discovery RatesJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 2002
- P Values as Random Variables-Expected P ValuesThe American Statistician, 1999