Distributive justice: an ordering of priorities. A comparative analysis of European opinions
- 15 July 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in International Review of Sociology
- Vol. 19 (2), 205-225
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03906700902833429
Abstract
As far as distributive justice is concerned, an important issue is to know whether the different principles by which a given distribution of goods is judged fair or unfair are exclusive or complementary. The European Values Survey carried out in 1999 shows clearly the priorities of Europeans in this matter. The first concerns the guarantee that ‘basic needs are met for all’, then comes ‘recognizing people on their merits’ and finally ‘eliminating big inequalities in income’. The consensus on this hierarchy is not altered by national, demographical, social, economic or political divisions. These different divisions do indeed influence opinions on each criterion, but, with very few exceptions, they are not sufficient to upset this order of priorities. Thus, the usual applied principles of distributive justice do not define competing spheres. Their nested (or ‘lexical’) order is compatible with the purely procedural condition of ‘equal liberty’.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Une théorie empirique de la justice socialeL'Année Sociologique, 2006
- Which Is the Fairest One of All? A Positive Analysis of Justice TheoriesJournal of Economic Literature, 2003
- Doing Rawls Justice: An Experimental Study of Income Distribution NormsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 2003
- The illusion of distributive justiceEuropean Sociological Review, 1987
- A New Theory of Distributive JusticeAmerican Sociological Review, 1980
- Equity, Equality, and Need: What Determines Which Value Will Be Used as the Basis of Distributive Justice?Journal of Social Issues, 1975
- Effects of perceptions of equity and inequity on worker performance and satisfaction.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1972
- A Theory of JusticePublished by Harvard University Press ,1971
- Inequity In Social ExchangeAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1965
- An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and LegislationPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1789