Self-managed abortion: A systematic scoping review
Open Access
- 1 February 2020
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Vol. 63, 87-110
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.08.002
Abstract
No abstract availableFunding Information
- David and Lucile Packard Foundation
This publication has 96 references indexed in Scilit:
- Regional differences in surgical intervention following medical termination of pregnancy provided by telemedicineActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2011
- How commonly do US abortion patients report attempts to self-induce?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2011
- Scoping studies: advancing the methodologyImplementation Science, 2010
- O689 Misoprostol used as abortion method under a risk reduction strategy to prevent maternal deaths associated with unsafe abortion (health initiatives against unsafe abortion)International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2009
- Author response to: Using telemedicine for termination of pregnancy with mifepristone and misoprostol in settings where there is no access to safe servicesBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2008
- Pharmacy provision of medical abortifacients in a Latin American cityContraception, 2006
- Reasons U.S. Women Have Abortions: Quantitative and Qualitative PerspectivesPerspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2005
- Scoping studies: towards a methodological frameworkInternational Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2005
- Reasons Why Women Have Induced Abortions: Evidence from 27 CountriesInternational Family Planning Perspectives, 1998
- COMPLICATIONS FROM INDUCED ABORTION IN BANGLADESH RELATED TO TYPES OF PRACTITIONER AND METHODS, AND IMPACT ON MORTALITYThe Lancet, 1981