Achieving the Goal of the London Summit on Family Planning By Adhering to Voluntary, Rights-Based Family Planning: What Can We Learn from Past Experiences with Coercion?
- 1 December 2014
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Guttmacher Institute in International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
- Vol. 40 (04), 206-214
- https://doi.org/10.1363/4020614
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Contraceptive implants: providing better choice to meet growing family planning demandGlobal Health: Science and Practice, 2013
- Population, Policy, and Politics: How Will History Judge China's One‐Child Policy?Population and Development Review, 2013
- Use of human rights to meet the unmet need for family planningThe Lancet, 2012
- ‘New bottle, but old wine’: From family planning to HIV/AIDS in post-Doi Moi Vietnam* *This article is based on a longer study that was developed in collaboration with Sexuality Policy Watch, with funding provided by the Ford Foundation. For an extended discussion of the issues examined in this article, see “From family planning to HIV/AIDS in Vietnam: Shifting priorities, remaining gaps”, which is available as part of the e-book, SexPolitics: Reports from the Front Lines, edited by Richard Parker, Rosalind Petchesky, and Robert Sember, 2007. This e-book includes a series of case studies, as well as a crosscutting analysis, focused on the politics of sexual health and rights in eight countries and two institutional contexts. SexPolitics can be found online at .Global Public Health, 2008
- SKEWED CONTRACEPTIVE METHOD MIX: WHY IT HAPPENS, WHY IT MATTERSJournal of Biosocial Science, 2005