Nonrandomized Comparison of Local Urokinase Thrombolysis Versus Systemic Heparin Anticoagulation for Superior Sagittal Sinus Thrombosis
- 1 October 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Stroke
- Vol. 32 (10), 2310-2317
- https://doi.org/10.1161/hs1001.096192
Abstract
Background and Purpose — We sought to compare the safety and efficacy of direct urokinase thrombolysis with systemic heparin anticoagulation for superior sagittal sinus thrombosis (SSST). Methods — At University at Buffalo (NY) and University of Texas (Dallas, Houston), we reviewed 40 consecutive patients with SSST, treated with local urokinase (thrombolysis group) or systemic heparin anticoagulation (heparin group). The thrombolysis group (n=20) received local urokinase into the SSS followed by systemic heparin anticoagulation. The heparin group (n=20) received systemic heparin anticoagulation only. Neurological dysfunction was rated as follows: 0, normal; 1, mild (but able to ambulate and communicate); 2, moderate (unable to ambulate, normal mentation); and 3, severe (unable to ambulate, altered mentation). Results — Age ( P =0.49), sex ( P =0.20), baseline venous infarction ( P =0.73), and predisposing illnesses ( P =0.52) were similar between the thrombolysis and heparin groups. Pretreatment neurological function was worse in the thrombolysis group (normal, n=5; mild, n=8; moderate, n=4; severe, n=3) than in the heparin group (normal, n=8; mild, n=8; moderate, n=3; severe, n=1) ( P =NS). Discharge neurological function was better in the thrombolysis group (normal, n=16; mild, n=3; moderate, n=1; severe, n=0) than in the heparin group (normal, n=9; mild, n=6; moderate, n=5; severe, n=0) ( P =0.019, Mann-Whitney U test). Hemorrhagic complications were 10% (n=2) in the thrombolysis group (subdural hematoma, retroperitoneal hemorrhage) and none in the heparin group ( P =0.49). Three of the heparin group patients developed complications of the underlying disease (status epilepticus, hydrocephalus, refractory papilledema). No deaths occurred. Length of hospital stay was similar between the groups ( P =0.79). Conclusions — Local thrombolysis with urokinase is fairly well tolerated and may be more effective than systemic heparin anticoagulation alone in treating SSST. A randomized, prospective study comparing these 2 treatments for SSST is warranted.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Anticoagulation Therapy in Pediatric Patients With Sinovenous ThrombosisArchives of Neurology, 1998
- Urokinase treatment of sagittal sinus thrombosis with venous hemorrhagic infarctionJournal Of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases, 1998
- Treatment of Acute Superior Sagittal Sinus Thrombosis by t-PA Infusion via Venography—Direct Thrombolytic Therapy in the Acute PhaseSurgical Neurology, 1998
- Thrombosis of the Deep Venous Drainage of the Brain in AdultsArchives of Neurology, 1995
- Treatment of dural sinus thrombosis using selective catheterization and urokinaseAnnals of Neurology, 1995
- Local fibrinolysis in cerebral venous thrombosisPediatric Neurology, 1994
- Heparin treatment in sinus venous thrombosisThe Lancet, 1991
- Thrombolysis for Superior Sagittal Sinus ThrombosisJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 1991
- Direct Endovascular Thrombolytic Therapy for Dural Sinus ThrombosisNeurosurgery, 1991
- Treatment of dural sinus thrombosis with local urokinase infusionJournal of Neurosurgery, 1988