Systematic review and mixed treatment comparison: dressings to heal diabetic foot ulcers
Open Access
- 29 April 2012
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Diabetologia
- Vol. 55 (7), 1902-1910
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-012-2558-5
Abstract
Aims/hypothesis Foot ulcers in people with diabetes are a common and serious global health issue. Dressings form a key part of ulcer treatment. Existing systematic reviews are limited by the lack of head-to-head comparisons of alternative dressings in a field where there are several different dressing options. We aimed to determine the relative effects of alternative wound dressings on the healing of diabetic foot ulcers. Methods This study was a systematic review involving Bayesian mixed treatment comparison. We included randomised controlled trials evaluating the effects on diabetic foot ulcer healing of one or more wound dressings. There were no restrictions based on language or publication status. Results Fifteen eligible studies, evaluating nine dressing types, were included. Ten direct treatment comparisons were made. Whilst there was increased healing associated with hydrogel and foam dressings compared with basic wound contact materials, these findings were based on data from small studies at unclear or high risk of bias. The mixed treatment comparison suggested that hydrocolloid-matrix dressings were associated with higher odds of ulcer healing than all other dressing types; there was a high degree of uncertainty around these estimates, which were deemed to be of very low quality. Conclusions/interpretation These findings summarise all available trial evidence regarding the use of dressings to heal diabetic foot ulcers. More expensive dressings may offer no advantages in terms of healing than cheaper basic dressings. In addition, evidence pointing to a difference in favour of ‘advanced’ dressing types over basic wound contact materials is of low or very low quality.This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidenceJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tablesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorialJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2010
- A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions to enhance the healing of chronic ulcers of the foot in diabetesDiabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, 2008
- Prospective randomized controlled study of Hydrofiber® dressing containing ionic silver or calcium alginate dressings in non‐ischaemic diabetic foot ulcersDiabetic Medicine, 2007
- Guidelines for the treatment of diabetic ulcersWound Repair and Regeneration, 2006
- Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisonsStatistics in Medicine, 2004
- Clinical Evaluation of a Semipermeable Polymeric Membrane Dressing for the Treatment of Chronic Diabetic Foot UlcersDiabetes Care, 1994
- First Joint Meeting of The Wound Healing Society and the European Tissue Repair SocietyWound Repair and Regeneration, 1993