Preoperative Measurement of Cartilage Defects by MRI Underestimates Lesion Size
Open Access
- 11 April 2011
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in CARTILAGE
- Vol. 2 (4), 389-393
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1947603510397534
Abstract
Objective: Anecdotal evidence suggests that MRI frequently underestimates the size of cartilage defects when compared with final lesion size after debridement of all degenerated tissue. This has potential implications for the choice of cartilage repair technique since most treatment algorithms are primarily driven by defect size. We conducted an investigation comparing size estimates based on preoperative MRI with final defect size after debridement. Our aim was to provide surgeons with more objective data to assist in predicting true defect size based on MRI scanning. Design: Patients were included in this retrospective study if they had undergone preoperative MRI and open cartilage repair within 12 months to minimize potential confounding by defect progression on MRI. Defect sizes measured after debridement were obtained from surgical notes and compared with MRI size estimates by 2 musculoskeletal radiologists. Results: Thirty-eight patients were enrolled with a median age of 37 years, median number of 1.7 defects, and a total median defect area of 6 cm2 per knee. Preoperative MRI scanning had predicted a median defect area of 3.6 cm2. This reflected a difference of 65% ( P < 0.001) between MRI and final defect area after debridement when 85% of all individual defects were larger than predicted by preoperative MRI. Conclusions: Our study compared the size of cartilage defects measured by preoperative MRI with surgical measurements after debridement. On average, the final total defect area per knee was 65% larger than estimated preoperatively by MRI. Individual defects were larger than predicted by 47% to 377%, depending on defect location.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Women lose patella cartilage at a faster rate than men: A 4.5-year cohort study of subjects with knee OAMaturitas, 2010
- Clinical Experiences With Autologous Osteochondral Mosaicplasty in an Athletic PopulationThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2010
- Clinical Efficacy of the Microfracture Technique for Articular Cartilage Repair in the KneeThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2009
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Chondral Lesions and RepairJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2009
- Cartilage Restoration, Part 2: Techniques, Outcomes, and Future DirectionsThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2005
- Magnetic resonance imaging of hyaline cartilage defects at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of medium T2‐weighted fast spin echo, T1‐weighted two‐dimensional and three‐dimensional gradient echo pulse sequencesActa Radiologica, 2005
- Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: Comparison between fat‐suppressed three‐dimensional SPGR imaging, fat‐suppressed FSE imaging, and fat‐suppressed three‐dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopyJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2004
- Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Compared with Microfracture in the KneeThe Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2004
- MR imaging for surgical planning and postoperative assessment in early osteoarthritisRadiologic Clinics of North America, 2004
- Measurement accuracy of focal cartilage defects from MRI and correlation of MRI graded lesions with histology: a preliminary studyOsteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2003