Mind-Body Medicine: State of the Science, Implications for Practice
Open Access
- 1 March 2003
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) in The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
- Vol. 16 (2), 131-147
- https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.16.2.131
Abstract
Background: Although emerging evidence during the past several decades suggests that psychosocial factors can directly influence both physiologic function and health outcomes, medicine had failed to move beyond the biomedical model, in part because of lack of exposure to the evidence base supporting the biopsychosocial model. The literature was reviewed to examine the efficacy of representative psychosocial-mind-body interventions, including relaxation, (cognitive) behavioral therapies, meditation, imagery, biofeedback, and hypnosis for several common clinical conditions. Methods: An electronic search was undertaken of the MEDLINE, PsycLIT, and the Cochrane Library databases and a manual search of the reference sections of relevant articles for related clinical trials and reviews of the literature. Studies examining mind-body interventions for psychological disorders were excluded. Owing to space limitations, studies examining more body-based therapies, such as yoga and tai chi chuan, were also not included. Data were extracted from relevant systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials. Results: Drawing principally from systematic reviews and meta-analyses, there is considerable evidence of efficacy for several mind-body therapies in the treatment of coronary artery disease (eg, cardiac rehabilitation), headaches, insomnia, incontinence, chronic low back pain, disease and treatment-related symptoms of cancer, and improving postsurgical outcomes. We found moderate evidence of efficacy for mind-body therapies in the areas of hypertension and arthritis. Additional research is required to clarify the relative efficacy of different mind-body therapies, factors (such as specific patient characteristics) that might predict more or less successful outcomes, and mechanisms of action. Research is also necessary to examine the cost offsets associated with mind-body therapies. Conclusions: There is now considerable evidence that an array of mind-body therapies can be used as effective adjuncts to conventional medical treatment for a number of common clinical conditions.Keywords
This publication has 91 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effect of Group Psychosocial Support on Survival in Metastatic Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY: Mapping Biobehavioral Contributions to Health and IllnessAnnual Review of Psychology, 1999
- Meta-analysis of the effects of psychoeducational care in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseasePatient Education and Counseling, 1996
- A Randomized Controlled Trial of Stress Reduction for Hypertension in Older African AmericansHypertension, 1995
- Behavioral and prophylactic pharmacological intervention studies of pediatric migraine: an exploratory meta-analysisPain, 1995
- Behavioral medicine, clinical health psychology, and cost offset.Health Psychology, 1995
- Evidence suggesting that health education for self‐management in patients with chronic arthritis has sustained health benefits while reducing health care costsArthritis & Rheumatism, 1993
- Immunological responses of breast cancer patients to behavioral interventionsApplied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 1993
- Hypnosis or cognitive behavioral training for the reduction of pain and nausea during cancer treatment: a controlled clinical trialPain, 1992
- The Need for a New Medical Model: A Challenge for BiomedicineScience, 1977