The Use of Subsets of Test Questions in an Angoff Standard-Setting Method
- 1 April 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 65 (2), 185-201
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164404264852
Abstract
In an Angoff standard-setting procedure, judges estimate the probability that a hypothetical randomly selected minimally competent candidate will answer correctly each item constituting the test. In many cases, these item performance estimates are made twice, with information shared with the judges between estimates. Especially for long tests, this estimation process can be time consuming and fatiguing for the participants. This study addressed the possibilities of reducing the number of items individual judges consider in an Angoff standard-setting study. The results of this study suggest that 50% of test items may be sufficient to estimate an equivalent passing score in an Angoff setting study. This could result in substantial savings of time and resources not only for the agencies that have been carrying out this activity but also for the practitioners (judges) who participate in standard-setting studies.Keywords
This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ability of Panelists to Estimate Item Performance for a Target Group of Candidates: An Issue in Judgmental Standard SettingEducational Assessment, 2001
- Judgmental Item Analysis of the Nedelsky and Angoff Standard-Setting MethodsApplied Measurement in Education, 1999