Are different groups of cancer patients offered rehabilitation to the same extent? A report from the population-based study “The Cancer Patient’s World”
- 21 May 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Supportive Care in Cancer
- Vol. 20 (5), 1089-1100
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-011-1189-6
Abstract
The number of cancer survivors is growing and cancer is now viewed as a chronic disease. This has highlighted the importance of providing adequate rehabilitation to prevent physical, psychological, and social sequelae of cancer. However, it is unclear whether those in need of rehabilitation are offered this. Using patient–observer agreement and cognitive interviews, we validated a seven-item questionnaire designed to assess cancer patients’ perception of the sufficiency of the offered rehabilitation. A cross-sectional study among 2,202 Danish cancer patients affiliated with hospitals was carried out. The questionnaire was well understood, indicating good validity. In the cross-sectional study, 1,490 patients (68%) participated. Up to 39% of cancer patients did not receive the physical rehabilitation they felt they needed. About half of those who had felt a need to talk to a psychologist were offered this. Insufficiency of other rehabilitation offers was reported by 10–24%. Age most consistently predicted insufficient rehabilitation; higher age predicted insufficient information about support from other sources (than hospital staff) and younger age predicted lack of help to manage symptoms, return to everyday life, and deal with financial and especially work-related consequences. We found no consistent signs of traditional social inequality in the perception of rehabilitation, but we observed some signs of social inequality for unemployed or divorced/separated patients. Age predicted sufficiency of the rehabilitation in two directions, possibly reflecting different needs in younger and older patients. When tailoring rehabilitation programs, it should be ensured that the different needs are met.This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Development and Initial Validation of the Three-Levels-of-Needs Questionnaire for Self-Assessment of Palliative Needs in Patients with CancerJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2011
- Breast Cancer Survival in Ontario and California, 1998–2006: Socioeconomic Inequity Remains Much Greater in the United StatesAnnals of Epidemiology, 2009
- Social inequality in incidence of and survival from cancer in a population-based study in Denmark, 1994–2003: Summary of findingsEuropean Journal of Cancer, 2008
- High-intensity strength training improves quality of life in cancer survivorsActa Oncologica, 2007
- Health-related quality of life in long-term breast cancer survivors: Nationwide survey in DenmarkBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2006
- Physical Activity and Survival After Colorectal Cancer DiagnosisJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- The Impact of Rehabilitation Support Services on Health-related Quality of Life for Women with Breast CancerBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2005
- Physical Activity and Survival After Breast Cancer DiagnosisJAMA, 2005
- Cancer patient survival by socioeconomic status in seven countries: a review for six common cancer sites [corrected]Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1994
- A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960