Ventricular Pacing or Dual-Chamber Pacing for Sinus-Node Dysfunction
Open Access
- 13 June 2002
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in The New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 346 (24), 1854-1862
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa013040
Abstract
Dual-chamber (atrioventricular) and single-chamber (ventricular) pacing are alternative treatment approaches for sinus-node dysfunction that causes clinically significant bradycardia. However, it is unknown which type of pacing results in the better outcome.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of Physiologic Pacing versus Ventricular Pacing on the Risk of Stroke and Death Due to Cardiovascular CausesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Dual-Chamber Pacing Is Superior to Ventricular PacingCirculation, 1998
- Pacemaker mode selection and survival: a plea to apply the principles of evidence based medicine to cardiac pacing practice.Heart, 1997
- Dual-Chamber Versus Ventricular PacingCirculation, 1996
- Permanent Pacemaker Selection and Subsequent Survival in Elderly Medicare Pacemaker RecipientsCirculation, 1995
- Prospective randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing in sick-sinus syndromeThe Lancet, 1994
- Physiological Consequences of Normal Atrioventricular Conduction: Applicability to Modern Cardiac PacingJournal of Cardiac Surgery, 1989
- Long-term pacing in sinus node disease: Effects of stimulation mode on cardiovascular morbidity and mortalityAmerican Heart Journal, 1988
- Doppler ultrasound measurement of cardiac output in patients with physiologic pacemakers: Effects of left ventricular function and retrograde ventriculoatrial conductionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1984
- Hemodynamic consequences of atrial and ventricular pacing in subjects with normal heartsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1966