Extent of surgery in cancer of the colon: Is more better?
Open Access
- 1 January 2015
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. in World Journal of Gastroenterology
- Vol. 21 (1), 132-138
- https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i1.132
Abstract
Since the introduction of total mesorectal excision as the standard approach in mid and low rectal cancer, the incidence of local recurrence has sharply declined. Similar attention to surgical technique in colon cancer (CC) has resulted in the concept of complete mesocolic excision (CME), which consists of complete removal of the intact mesentery and high ligation of the vascular supply at its origin. Although renewed attention to meticulous surgical technique certainly has its merits, routine implementation of CME is currently unfounded. Firstly, in contrast to rectal cancer, local recurrence originating from an incompletely removed mesentery is rare in CC and usually a manifestation of systemic disease. Secondly, although CME may increase nodal counts and therefore staging accuracy, this is unlikely to affect survival since the observed relationship between nodal counts and outcome in CC is most probably not causal but confounded by a range of clinical variables. Thirdly, several lines of evidence suggest that metastasis to locoregional nodes occurs early and is a stochastic rather than a stepwise phenomenon in CC, in essence reflecting the tumor-host-metastasis relationship. Unsurprisingly, therefore, comparative studies in CC as well as in other digestive cancers have failed to demonstrate any survival benefit associated with extensive, additional or extra-mesenteric lymphadenectomy. Finally, routine implementation of CME may cause patient harm by longer operating times, major vascular damage and autonomic nerve injury. Therefore, data from randomized trials reporting relevant endpoints are required before CME can be recommended as a standard approach in CC surgery.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Lymphatic spread, nodal count and the extent of lymphadenectomy in cancer of the colonCancer Treatment Reviews, 2013
- Aberrant drainage of sentinel lymph nodes in colon cancer and its impact on staging and extent of operationThe American Journal of Surgery, 2013
- Prognostic Factors for Locoregional Recurrences in Colon CancerAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2012
- Optimal margins and lymphadenectomy in colonic cancer surgeryBritish Journal of Surgery, 2011
- Prognostic Impact of Inferior Mesenteric Artery Lymph Node Metastasis in Colorectal CancerAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2010
- Genetic disparity between primary tumours, disseminated tumour cells, and manifest metastasisInternational Journal of Cancer, 2009
- Biological Research in the Evolution of Cancer Surgery: A Personal PerspectiveCancer Research, 2008
- Radical lymph node resection of the retroperitoneal area for left-sided colon cancerLangenbecks Archives Of Surgery, 2007
- Number of Lymph Node Metastases Is Better Predictor of Prognosis Than Level of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Node-Positive Colon CancerJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2006
- Locoregional recurrence and survival after curative resection of adenocarcinoma of the colonJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2002