CRIMSON [CRisis plan IMpact: Subjective and Objective coercion and eNgagement] Protocol: A randomised controlled trial of joint crisis plans to reduce compulsory treatment of people with psychosis
Open Access
- 5 November 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Trials
- Vol. 11 (1), 102
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-102
Abstract
The use of compulsory treatment under the Mental Health Act (MHA) has continued to rise in the UK and in other countries. The Joint Crisis Plan (JCP) is a statement of service users' wishes for treatment in the event of a future mental health crisis. It is developed with the clinical team and an independent facilitator. A recent pilot RCT showed a reduction in the use of the MHA amongst service users with a JCP. The JCP is the only intervention that has been shown to reduce compulsory treatment in this way. The CRIMSON trial aims to determine if JCPs, compared with treatment as usual, are effective in reducing the use of the MHA in a range of treatment settings across the UK. This is a 3 centre, individual-level, single-blind, randomised controlled trial of the JCP compared with treatment as usual for people with a history of relapsing psychotic illness in Birmingham, London and Lancashire/Manchester. 540 service users will be recruited across the three sites. Eligible service users will be adults with a diagnosis of a psychotic disorder (including bipolar disorder), treated in the community under the Care Programme Approach with at least one admission to a psychiatric inpatient ward in the previous two years. Current inpatients and those subject to a community treatment order will be excluded to avoid any potential perceived pressure to participate. Research assessments will be conducted at baseline and 18 months. Following the baseline assessment, eligible service users will be randomly allocated to either develop a Joint Crisis Plan or continue with treatment as usual. Outcome will be assessed at 18 months with assessors blind to treatment allocation. The primary outcome is the proportion of service users treated or otherwise detained under an order of the Mental Health Act (MHA) during the follow-up period, compared across randomisation groups. Secondary outcomes include overall costs, service user engagement, perceived coercion and therapeutic relationships. Sub-analyses will explore the effectiveness of the JCP in reducing use of the MHA specifically for Black Caribbean and Black African service users (combined). Qualitative investigations with staff and service users will explore the acceptability of the JCPs. JCPs offer a potential solution to the rise of compulsory treatment for individuals with psychotic disorders and, if shown to be effective in this trial, they are likely to be of interest to mental health service providers worldwide. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN11501328This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Psychiatric advance directives and reduction of coercive crisis interventionsJournal of Mental Health, 2008
- Joint crisis plans for people with psychosis: economic evaluation of a randomised controlled trialBMJ, 2006
- The Content and Clinical Utility of Psychiatric Advance DirectivesPsychiatric Services, 2005
- Adapting to the challenge of psychosis: personal resilience and the use of sealing-over (avoidant) coping strategiesThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 2004
- The measurement of engagement in the homeless mentally ill: the Homeless Engagement and Acceptance Scale – HEASPsychological Medicine, 2002
- A study of ‘crisis cards' in a community psychiatric serviceActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1999
- Crisis cards and self-help crisis initiativesPsychiatric Bulletin, 1998
- A Practical Guide for Calculating Indirect Costs of DiseasePharmacoEconomics, 1996
- Costs, effects and C/E‐ratios alongside a clinical trialHealth Economics, 1994
- Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1989