Attitudes of pregnant women and male partners towards non-invasive prenatal testing and widening the scope of prenatal screening
Open Access
- 19 March 2014
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in European Journal of Human Genetics
- Vol. 22 (12), 1345-1350
- https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2014.32
Abstract
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and its potential to test for multiple disorders has received much attention. This study explores attitudes of women and men towards NIPT, and their views on widening the scope of prenatal testing in a country with a low uptake of prenatal screening (The Netherlands). Five focus groups with low-risk pregnant women (n=28), three focus groups with men (n=19) and 13 interviews with high- and low-risk pregnant women were conducted. Participants felt that current prenatal screening has great disadvantages such as uncertain results and risk of miscarriage from follow-up diagnostics. Characteristics of NIPT (accurate, safe and early testing) could therefore diminish these disadvantages of prenatal screening and help lower the barrier for participation. This suggests that NIPT might allow couples to decide about prenatal testing based mostly on their will to test or not, rather than largely based on fear of miscarriage risk or the uncertainty of results. The lower barrier for participation was also seen as a downside that could lead to uncritical use or pressure to test. Widening the scope of prenatal testing was seen as beneficial for severe disorders, although it was perceived difficult to determine where to draw the line. Participants argued that there should be a limit to the scope of NIPT, avoiding testing for minor abnormalities. The findings suggest that NIPT could enable more meaningful decision-making for prenatal screening. However, to ensure voluntary participation, especially when testing for multiple disorders, safeguards on the basis of informed decision-making will be of utmost importancThis publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Parental duties and prenatal screening: Does an offer of prenatal screening lead women to believe that they are morally compelled to test?Midwifery, 2012
- Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis by massively parallel sequencing of maternal plasma DNAOpen Biology, 2012
- Attitudes toward non-invasive prenatal diagnosis among pregnant women and health professionals in JapanPrenatal Diagnosis, 2012
- Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis: pregnant women's interest and expected uptakePrenatal Diagnosis, 2011
- First-trimester screening for trisomy 21 in Denmark: implications for detection and birth rates of trisomy 18 and trisomy 13Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2011
- Will the introduction of non-invasive prenatal diagnostic testing erode informed choices? An experimental study of health care professionalsPatient Education and Counseling, 2010
- Non-invasive prenatal testing: ethical issues exploredEuropean Journal of Human Genetics, 2009
- Online focus groups as a tool to collect data in hard-to-include populations: examples from paediatric oncologyBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2009
- The attitude of women toward current and future possibilities of diagnostic testing in maternal blood using fetal DNAPrenatal Diagnosis, 2009
- The impact of ethical beliefs on decisions about prenatal screening tests: Searching for justificationSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 2008