Tobacco industry efforts to present ventilation as an alternative to smoke-free environments in North America
Open Access
- 1 March 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by BMJ in Tobacco Control
- Vol. 13 (90001), 41i-47
- https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2003.004101
Abstract
To describe how the tobacco industry developed a network of consultants to promote ventilation as a "solution" to secondhand smoke (SHS) in the USA. Analysis of previously secret tobacco industry documents. As with its other strategies to undermine the passage of clean indoor legislation and regulations, the tobacco industry used consultants who represented themselves as independent but who were promoting the industry's ventilation "solution" strategies under close, but generally undisclosed, industry supervision. The nature of the industry's use of ventilation consultants evolved over time. In the 1980s, the industry used them in an effort to steer the concerns about indoor air quality away from secondhand smoke, saying SHS was an insignificant component of a much larger problem of indoor air quality and inadequate ventilation. By the 1990s, the industry and its consultants were maintaining that adequate ventilation could easily accommodate "moderate smoking". The consultants carried the ventilation message to businesses, particularly the hospitality business, and to local and national and international regulatory and legislative bodies. While the tobacco industry and its consultants have gone to considerable lengths to promote the tobacco industry's ventilation "solution", this strategy has had limited success in the USA, probably because, in the end, it is simpler, cheaper, and healthier to end smoking. Tobacco control advocates need to continue to educate policymakers about this fact, particularly in regions where this strategy has been more effective.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- A tobacco industry study of airline cabin air quality: dropping inconvenient findingsTobacco Control, 2004
- "Can't stop the boy": Philip Morris' use of Healthy Buildings International to prevent workplace smoking bans in AustraliaTobacco Control, 2003
- Science for hire: A tobacco industry strategy to influence public opinion on secondhand smokeNicotine & Tobacco Research, 2003
- Tobacco industry success in preventing regulation of secondhand smoke in Latin America: the "Latin Project"Tobacco Control, 2002
- ASHRAE Standard 62: tobacco industry's influence over national ventilation standardsTobacco Control, 2002
- Philip Morris' new scientific initiative: an analysisTobacco Control, 2001
- Tobacco industry efforts at discrediting scientific knowledge of environmental tobacco smoke: a review of internal industry documentsJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2001
- Whose standard is it, anyway? How the tobacco industry determines the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards for tobacco and tobacco productsTobacco Control, 2001
- Exposure of U.S. workers to environmental tobacco smoke.Environmental Health Perspectives, 1999
- Industry-Funded Research and Conflict of Interest: An Analysis of Research Sponsored by the Tobacco Industry Through the Center for Indoor Air ResearchJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1996