Unstable Preferences:
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Medical Decision Making
- Vol. 20 (1), 62-71
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X0002000108
Abstract
Objective. Many studies suggest that impaired health states are valued more positively when experienced than when hypothetical. This study investigated to what extent this discrepancy occurs and examined four possible explanations: non-corresponding description of the hypothetical health state, new understanding due to experience with the health state, valuation shift due to a new status quo, and instability of preference. Patients and methods. Fifty-five breast cancer patients evaluated their actually experienced health state, a radiotherapy scenario, and a chemotherapy control scenario before, during, and after postoperative radiotherapy. Utilities were elicited by means of a visual analog scale (VAS), a chained time tradeoff (TTO), and a chained standard gamble (SG). Results. The discrepancy was found for all methods and was statistically significant for the TTO (predicted utilities: 0.89, actual utilities: 0.92, p ≤ 0.05). During radiotherapy, significant differences (p ≤ 0.01) were found between the utilities for the radiotherapy scenario and the actual health state by means of the VAS and the SG, suggesting non-corresponding description as an explanation. The utilities of the radiotherapy scenario and the chemotherapy control scenario remained stable over time, and thus new understanding, valuation shift, and instability could be ruled out as explanations. Conclusion. Utilities obtained through hypothetical scenarios may not be valid predictors of the value judgments of actually experienced health states. The discrepancy in this study seems to have been due to differences between the situations in question (non-corresponding descriptions). Key words: stability; utility assessment; standard gamble; time tradeoff; breast cancer; chemotherapy; radiotherapy. (Med Decis Making 2000;20:62-71)Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patients' Utilities for Cancer TreatmentsMedical Decision Making, 1998
- The effect of experience of illness on health state valuationsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1996
- When More Pain Is Preferred to Less: Adding a Better EndPsychological Science, 1993
- Cancer Patients' Evaluations of Their Current Health StateMedical Decision Making, 1992
- Association between recombinant human erythropoietin and quality of life and exercise capacity of patients receiving haemodialysis. Canadian Erythropoietin Study Group.BMJ, 1990
- Whose Utilities for Decision Analysis?Medical Decision Making, 1990
- Eliciting preferences for alternative drug therapies in oncology: Influence of treatment outcome description, elicitation technique and treatment experience on preferencesJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987
- The assessment of values in laryngeal cancer: Reliability of measurement methodsJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1984
- Discount Functions and the Measurement of Patients' ValuesMedical Decision Making, 1984
- The utility of different health states as perceived by the general publicJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1978