Comparison with HTTP and MQTT on required network resources for IoT
- 1 September 2016
- conference paper
- conference paper
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Abstract
HTTP has been widely applied for data transfer. However, in networks for IoT, this protocol causes a large overhead. To solve this problem, named based transfer protocols have been discussed. This paper compares the performance of HTTP with that of MQTT, a type of named based transfer protocol. Additionally, the paper proposes enhancements to MQTT for better performance.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Information-centric networking for the internet of things: challenges and opportunitiesIEEE Network, 2016
- Hypertext Transfer Protocol Version 2 (HTTP/2)Published by RFC Editor ,2015
- A Survey of Green Information-Centric Networking: Research Issues and ChallengesIEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2015
- Name Label Switching Paradigm for Named Data NetworkingIEEE Communications Letters, 2015
- DataClouds: Enabling Community-Based Data-Centric Services Over the Internet of ThingsIEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2014
- A Survey of Information-Centric Networking ResearchIEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2013
- A survey of naming and routing in information-centric networksIEEE Communications Magazine, 2012
- CATT: Cache aware target identification for ICNIEEE Communications Magazine, 2012
- A survey of information-centric networkingIEEE Communications Magazine, 2012
- Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.0Published by RFC Editor ,1996