Follow the Leader: Theory and Evidence on Political Participation
- 1 June 1999
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in American Economic Review
- Vol. 89 (3), 525-547
- https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.3.525
Abstract
Using state-by-state voting data for U.S. presidential elections, we observe that voter turnout is a positive function of predicted closeness. To explain the strategic component of political participation, we develop a follow-the-leader model. Political leaders expend effort according to their chance of being pivotal, which depends on the expected closeness of the race (at both state and national levels) and how voters respond to their effort. Structural estimation supports this model. For example, a 1-percent increase in the predicted closeness at the state level stimulates leaders' efforts, which increases turnout by 0.34 percent. (JEL D72, C33, C72, H41)Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Redistribution, Income, and VotingAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1993
- Forecasting the Presidential Vote in the StatesAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1992
- Closeness, Expenditures, and Turnout in the 1982 U.S. House ElectionsAmerican Political Science Review, 1989
- The economic model of voter participation: A further testPublic Choice, 1988
- The Downsian model of electoral participation: Formal theory and empirical analysis of the constituency size effectPublic Choice, 1987
- The Performance of Rational Voter Models in Recent Presidential ElectionsAmerican Political Science Review, 1983
- A note on political participation as consumption behaviorPublic Choice, 1977
- Campaign Resource Allocations Under the Electoral CollegeAmerican Political Science Review, 1975
- The 3/2's Rule in Presidential CampaigningAmerican Political Science Review, 1974
- Is the act of voting rational?Public Choice, 1973