Perception of emotional expressions is independent of face selectivity in monkey inferior temporal cortex
Open Access
- 8 April 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
- Vol. 105 (14), 5591-5596
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0800489105
Abstract
The ability to perceive and differentiate facial expressions is vital for social communication. Numerous functional MRI (fMRI) studies in humans have shown enhanced responses to faces with different emotional valence, in both the amygdala and the visual cortex. However, relatively few studies have examined how valence influences neural responses in monkeys, thereby limiting the ability to draw comparisons across species and thus understand the underlying neural mechanisms. Here we tested the effects of macaque facial expressions on neural activation within these two regions using fMRI in three awake, behaving monkeys. Monkeys maintained central fixation while blocks of different monkey facial expressions were presented. Four different facial expressions were tested: (i) neutral, (ii) aggressive (open-mouthed threat), (iii) fearful (fear grin), and (iv) submissive (lip smack). Our results confirmed that both the amygdala and the inferior temporal cortex in monkeys are modulated by facial expressions. As in human fMRI, fearful expressions evoked the greatest response in monkeys—even though fearful expressions are physically dissimilar in humans and macaques. Furthermore, we found that valence effects were not uniformly distributed over the inferior temporal cortex. Surprisingly, these valence maps were independent of two related functional maps: (i) the map of “face-selective” regions (faces versus non-face objects) and (ii) the map of “face-responsive” regions (faces versus scrambled images). Thus, the neural mechanisms underlying face perception and valence perception appear to be distinct.This publication has 84 references indexed in Scilit:
- FRAP and kinetic modeling in the analysis of nuclear protein dynamics: what do we really know?Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 2010
- Uptake, Distribution and Diffusivity of Reactive Fluorophores in Cells: Implications toward Target IdentificationMolecular Pharmaceutics, 2010
- Molecular crowding affects diffusion and binding of nuclear proteins in heterochromatin and reveals the fractal organization of chromatinThe EMBO Journal, 2009
- Activation of Hormone-sensitive Lipase Requires Two Steps, Protein Phosphorylation and Binding to the PAT-1 Domain of Lipid Droplet Coat ProteinsOnline Journal of Public Health Informatics, 2009
- Intracellular transport by active diffusionTrends in Cell Biology, 2009
- Transport through the Golgi Apparatus by Rapid Partitioning within a Two-Phase Membrane SystemCell, 2008
- Raster image correlation spectroscopy (RICS) for measuring fast protein dynamics and concentrations with a commercial laser scanning confocal microscopeJournal of Microscopy, 2007
- Quantification of polarized trafficking of transferrin and comparison with bulk membrane transport in hepatic cellsBiochemical Journal, 2006
- Polyglutamine protein aggregates are dynamicNature, 2002
- Cortical Surface-Based Analysis: I. Segmentation and Surface ReconstructionNeuroImage, 1999