Citation analysis of identical consensus statements revealed journal-related bias
- 30 June 2010
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 63 (6), 660-664
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.09.012
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Citations to trials of nicotine replacement therapy were biased toward positive results and high-impact-factor journalsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2009
- An analysis of bibliometric indicators, National Institutes of Health funding, and faculty size at Association of American Medical Colleges medical schools, 1997–2007Journal of the Medical Library Association, 2008
- Bibliometric analysis of pentachlorophenol remediation methods during the period of 1994 to 2005Scientometrics, 2008
- Factors related to the frequency of citation of epidemiologic publicationsEpidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations, 2008
- Prediction of citation counts for clinical articles at two years using data available within three weeks of publication: retrospective cohort studyBMJ, 2008
- What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behaviorJournal of Documentation, 2008
- The relationship between quality of research and citation frequencyBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2006
- Citation rates and perceptions of scientific contributionJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2005
- Journal Prestige, Publication Bias, and Other Characteristics Associated With Citation of Published Studies in Peer-Reviewed JournalsJAMA, 2002
- Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impactJournal of the American Society for Information Science, 1994