Nutritional evaluation of protein hydrolysate formulas in healthy term infants: plasma amino acids, hematology, and trace elements
Open Access
- 1 August 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier BV in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Vol. 78 (2), 296-301
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/78.2.296
Abstract
Background: Protein hydrolysate formulas are used for infants with food allergy. Most studies of such formulas focus on their effect on allergy and rarely evaluate their capacity to provide normal nutritional status. Objective: We compared plasma aminograms, serum urea nitrogen, and trace element status in breastfed infants, infants fed hydrolysate formulas, and infants fed milk formula. Design: From 6 wk to 6 mo of age, infants were breastfed or fed regular milk formula (RF), 1 of 2 casein-hydrolysate formulas (CH-1 or CH-2), or whey-hydrolysate formula (WH). Anthropometric measures were taken monthly, and blood samples were collected at 6 wk and 6 mo. Plasma amino acids, serum urea nitrogen, hematologic indexes, plasma zinc, and plasma copper were analyzed. Results: There were no significant differences in hemoglobin, serum transferrin receptor, copper, or zinc among groups. Serum ferritin was significantly lower in infants fed the CH formulas than in the other groups. Infants fed CH-2 had significantly higher serum urea nitrogen than did all other groups. Plasma threonine, valine, phenylalanine, methionine, and tryptophan were significantly higher in the hydrolysate formula groups than in the breastfed group. Plasma tyrosine was significantly lower in infants fed the CH formulas than in the breastfed group, whereas arginine was significantly higher in the WH group than in all other groups. Plasma proline was lower, whereas threonine and tryptophan were higher, in the WH group than in the CH groups. Conclusions: The iron status of infants fed CH formula was lower than that of all other groups. The amounts of amino acids provided by hydrolysate formulas appear excessive compared with regular formula, which is reflected by high serum urea nitrogen (CH-2) and high plasma amino acid concentrations. A reduced and more balanced amino acid content of hydrolysate formulas may be beneficial.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of a partially hydrolyzed infant formula with two extensively hydrolyzed formulas for allergy prevention:A prospective, randomized studyPediatric Allergy and Immunology, 2000
- Plasma Amino Acid Concentrations in Term‐Born Infants Fed a Whey Predominant or a Whey Hydrolysate FormulaJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 1997
- Efficacy and safety of hydrolyzed cow milk and amino acid–derived formulas in infants with cow milk allergyThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1995
- The long-term effect of a partial whey hydrolysate formula on the prophylaxis of atopic diseaseEuropean Journal of Pediatrics, 1995
- Nutritional evaluation of various protein hydrolysate formulae in term infants during the first month of lifeActa Paediatrica, 1994
- Effects of Formula Protein Level and Ratio on Infant Growth, Plasma Amino Acids and Serum Trace Elements II. Follow‐up FormulaActa Paediatrica, 1990
- Protein Content of Infant Formula—How Much and from What Age?Acta Paediatrica, 1988
- Indices of protein metabolism in term infants fed either human milk or formulas with reduced protein concentration and various whey/casein ratiosThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1987
- Milk Protein Intake in the Term InfantActa Paediatrica, 1986
- Increased Ureagenesis and Impaired Nitrogen Use during Infusion of a Synthetic Amino Acid FormulaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982