Democratic Theory and Border Coercion
Top Cited Papers
- 1 February 2008
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Political Theory
- Vol. 36 (1), 37-65
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591707310090
Abstract
The question of whether a closed border entry policy under the unilateral control of a democratic state is legitimate cannot be settled until we first know to whom the justification of a regime of control is owed. According to the state sovereignty view, the control of entry policy, including of movement, immigration, and naturalization, ought to be under the unilateral discretion of the state itself: justification for entry policy is owed solely to members. This position, however, is inconsistent with the democratic theory of popular sovereignty. Anyone accepting the democratic theory of political legitimation domestically is thereby committed to rejecting the unilateral domestic right to control state boundaries. Because the demos of democratic theory is in principle unbounded, the regime of boundary control must be democratically justified to foreigners as well as to citizens, in political institutions in which both foreigners and citizens can participate.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does Collective Identity Presuppose an Other? On the Alleged Incoherence of Global SolidarityAmerican Political Science Review, 2005
- Authority and CoercionPhilosophy & Public Affairs, 2003
- Democratic Secession from a Multinational StateEthics, 2002
- What We Can Reasonably Reject1Philosophical Issues, 2001
- The coerciveness of lawOxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2000
- Reflections on Habermas on DemocracyRatio Juris, 1999
- Changing Paradigms of Citizenship and the Exclusiveness of the DemosInternational Sociology, 1999
- The Dynamics of Democratic ExclusionJournal of Democracy, 1998
- What is So Special about Our Fellow Countrymen?Ethics, 1988
- Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open BordersThe Review of Politics, 1987