The ESHRE–ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies
Open Access
- 13 June 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Gynecological Surgery
- Vol. 10 (3), 199-212
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-013-0800-x
Abstract
The new ESHRE/ESGE classification system of female genital anomalies is presented, aiming to provide a more suitable classification system for the accurate, clear, correlated with clinical management and simple categorization of female genital anomalies. Congenital malformations of the female genital tract are common miscellaneous deviations from normal anatomy with health and reproductive consequences. Until now, three systems have been proposed for their categorization, but all of them are associated with serious limitations. The European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) have established a common Working Group, under the name CONUTA (CONgenital UTerine Anomalies), with the goal of developing a new updated classification system. A scientific committee has been appointed to run the project, looking also for consensus within the scientists working in the field. The new system is designed and developed based on: (1) scientific research through critical review of current proposals and preparation of an initial proposal for discussion between the experts, (2) consensus measurement among the experts through the use of the DELPHI procedure and (3) consensus development by the scientific committee, taking into account the results of the DELPHI procedure and the comments of the experts. Almost 90 participants took part in the process of development of the ESHRE/ESGE classification system, contributing with their structured answers and comments. The ESHRE/ESGE classification system is based on anatomy. Anomalies are classified into the following main classes, expressing uterine anatomical deviations deriving from the same embryological origin: U0, normal uterus; U1, dysmorphic uterus; U2, septate uterus; U3, bicorporeal uterus; U4, hemi-uterus; U5, aplastic uterus; U6, for still unclassified cases. Main classes have been divided into sub-classes expressing anatomical varieties with clinical significance. Cervical and vaginal anomalies are classified independently into sub-classes having clinical significance. The ESHRE/ESGE classification of female genital anomalies seems to fulfil the expectations and the needs of the experts in the field, but its clinical value needs to be proved in everyday practice. The ESHRE/ESGE classification system of female genital anomalies could be used as a starting point for the development of guidelines for their diagnosis and treatment.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Uterine rudiments in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome consist of typical uterine tissue types with predominantly basalis-like endometriumFertility and Sterility, 2013
- Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic reviewUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2011
- The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic reviewHuman Reproduction Update, 2011
- New Outpatient Subclassification System for American Fertility Society Classes V and VI Uterine AnomaliesJournal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2009
- Small uterine septum is an important risk variable for preterm birthEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2007
- Obstructive Mullerian Anomalies and Modern Laparoscopic ManagementJournal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 2007
- Laparoscopic management of unicornuate uterus with non-communicating rudimentary horn (three cases)Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 2006
- Laparoscopic removal of the cavitated noncommunicating rudimentary uterine horn: Surgical aspects in 10 casesFertility and Sterility, 2005
- Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment resultsHuman Reproduction Update, 2001
- Müllerian Anomalies: A Proposed Classification (An Analysis of 144 Cases)Fertility and Sterility, 1979