The effect of physician risk tolerance and the presence of an observation unit on decision making for ED patients with chest pain
- 1 September 2010
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 28 (7), 771-779
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2009.03.019
Abstract
We sought to determine whether risk tolerance as measured by scales (malpractice fear scale [MFS], risk-taking scale [RTS], and stress from uncertainty scale [SUS]) is associated with decisions to admit or use computed tomography (CT) coronary angiogram and decisions to order cardiac markers in emergency department (ED) patients with chest pain. We also studied if the opening of an ED-based observation unit affected the relationship between risk scales and admission decisions. Data from a prospective study of ED patients 30 years or older with chest pain were used. Risk scales were administered to ED attending physicians who initially evaluated them. Physicians were divided into quartiles for each separate risk scale. Fisher's exact test and logistic regression were used for statistical analysis. A total of 2872 patients were evaluated by 31 physicians. The most risk-averse quartile of RTS was associated with higher admission rates (78% vs 68%) and greater use of cardiac markers (83% vs 78%) vs the least risk-averse quartile. This was not true for MFS or SUS. Similar associations were observed in low-risk patients (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction risk score of 0 or 1). The observation unit was not associated with a higher admission rate and did not modify the relationship between risk scales and admission rates. The RTS was associated with the decision to admit or use computed tomography coronary angiogram, as well as the use of cardiac markers, whereas the MFS and SUS were not. The observation unit did not affect admission rates and nor did it affect how physician's risk tolerance affects admission decisions.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Risk of Missed Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction Associated With Emergency Department VolumeAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2006
- Prospective Validation of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Risk Score in the Emergency Department Chest Pain PopulationAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2006
- Emergency Physicians' Fear of Malpractice in Evaluating Patients With Possible Acute Cardiac IschemiaAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2005
- Prediction of missed myocardial infarction among symptomatic outpatients without coronary heart diseaseAmerican Heart Journal, 2005
- Is the initial diagnostic impression of “noncardiac chest pain” adequate to exclude cardiac disease?Annals of Emergency Medicine, 2004
- Cause-and-effect Analysis of Risk Management Files to Assess Patient Care in the Emergency DepartmentAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2004
- Safety and efficiency of emergency department assessment of chest discomfortCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2004
- How Useful Are Clinical Features in the Diagnosis of Acute, Undifferentiated Chest Pain?Academic Emergency Medicine, 2002
- Early prediction of acute myocardial infarction from clinical history, examination and electrocardiogram in the emergency roomThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1991
- Physicians?? Reactions to Uncertainty in Patient Care A New Measure and New InsightsMedical Care, 1990