Community responses during the early phase of the COVID-19 epidemic in Hong Kong: risk perception, information exposure and preventive measures
Open Access
- 27 February 2020
- preprint content
- other
- Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Abstract
Background: Community responses are important for outbreak management during the early phase when non-pharmaceutical interventions are the major preventive options. Therefore, this study aims to examine the psychological and behavioral responses of the community during the early phase of the COVID-19 epidemic in Hong Kong.Method: A cross-sectional online survey was launched within 36 hours after confirmed COVID-19 cases were first reported. Councilors of all 452 district council constituency areas were approached for survey dissemination. Respondent demographics, anxiety level, risk perception, sources to retrieve COVID-19 information, actual adoption and perceived efficacy of precautionary measures were collected.Result: Analysis from 1715 complete responses indicated high perceived susceptibility (89%) and high perceived severity (97%). Most respondents were worried about COVID-19 (97%), and had their daily routines disrupted (slightly/greatly: 98%). The anxiety level, measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, was borderline abnormal (9.01). Nearly all respondents were alert to the disease progression (99.5%). The most trusted information sources were doctors (84%), followed by broadcast (57%) and newspaper (54%), but they were not common information sources (doctor: 5%; broadcast: 34%; newspaper: 40%). Only 16% respondents found official websites reliable. Enhanced personal hygiene practices and travel avoidance to China were frequently adopted (>77%) and considered effective (>90%). The adoption of social-distancing measures was lower (39%-88%), and their drivers for greater adoption include: being female (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]:1.27), living in the New Territories (aOR:1.32-1.55), perceived as having good understanding of COVID-19 (aOR:1.84) and being more anxious (aOR:1.07).Discussion: Risk perception towards COVID-19 in the community was high. Most respondents are alert to the disease progression, and adopt self-protective measures. This study contributes by examining the psycho-behavioral responses of hosts, in addition to the largely studied mechanistic aspects, during the early phase of the current COVID-19 epidemic. The timely psychological and behavioral assessment of the community is useful to inform subsequent interventions and risk communication strategies as the epidemic progresses.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Epidemic Models of Contact Tracing: Systematic Review of Transmission Studies of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome and Middle East Respiratory SyndromeComputational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 2019
- Is the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) a valid measure in a general population 65–80 years old? A psychometric evaluation studyHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2017
- A validation study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in a large sample of French employeesBMC Psychiatry, 2014
- A confirmatory bifactor analysis of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in an Italian community sampleHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2014
- Perceived risk, anxiety, and behavioural responses of the general public during the early phase of the Influenza A (H1N1) pandemic in the Netherlands: results of three consecutive online surveysBMC Public Health, 2011
- Community Psychological and Behavioral Responses through the First Wave of the 2009 Influenza A(H1N1) Pandemic in Hong KongThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2010
- Monitoring community responses to the SARS epidemic in Hong Kong: from day 10 to day 62Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2003
- The impact of community psychological responses on outbreak control for severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong KongJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2003
- The Hospital Anxiety And Depression ScaleHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2003
- The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleJournal of Psychosomatic Research, 2002