Determining the effectiveness of mental health services from a consumer perspective: Part 2: Barriers to recovery and principles for evaluation
- 1 April 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
- Vol. 17 (2), 123-130
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0349.2008.00520.x
Abstract
The routine use of standardized outcome measures has been introduced to assess the effectiveness of mental health service delivery throughout Australia. The use of these measures has been criticized for failing to reflect those aspects of treatment consumers consider to affect their recovery. This is the second of a two-part paper. Its aim is to explore the views of consumers regarding factors that impede recovery and to explore the principles that ideally should underpin the evaluation of mental health services. Focus group interviews were conducted with consumers of mental health services (n = 16) from one rural and one metropolitan mental health service in Victoria, Australia. This paper presents the findings, pertaining to aspects of mental health services that pose barriers to recovery. The main themes to emerge were: staffing issues; hearing the person not the illness; lack of safety and security; and, isolation. The main themes to emerge regarding the evaluation of mental health services were: consumer involvement; peer support and more responsive care and treatment. The views of participants suggest that the effective evaluation of mental health services requires an increased focus on the views and opinions of consumers in order to develop more responsive mental health services.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Involving mental health service users in quality assuranceHealth Expectations, 2006
- Service users and other stakeholders’ evaluation of a liaison mental health service in an accident and emergency department and a general hospital settingJournal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 2006
- The importance of personal medicine: A qualitative study of resilience in people with psychiatric disabilitiesScandinavian Journal of Public Health, 2005
- Nurses’ views on ethical codes: a focus group studyJournal of Advanced Nursing, 2005
- The learning curve: the advantages and disadvantages in the use of focus groups as a method of data collectionNurse Researcher, 2004
- MENTAL HEALTH REFORMS AND THEIR IMPACT ON CONSUMER AND CARER PARTICIPATION: A PERSPECTIVE FROM VICTORIA, AUSTRALIAIssues in Mental Health Nursing, 2004
- Evaluation of the Department of Veterans Affairs Community-Based Outpatient ClinicsMedical Care, 2002
- Consumer participation in mental health services: who wants it and why?Australian Health Review, 2002
- What Is Recovery? A Conceptual Model and ExplicationPsychiatric Services, 2001
- User involvement in identifying health needs and shaping and evaluating services: is it being realised?Journal of Advanced Nursing, 1999