Limitations in Structural Identification of Large Constructed Structures
- 1 August 2007
- journal article
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in Journal of Structural Engineering
- Vol. 133 (8), 1051-1066
- https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2007)133:8(1051)
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to discuss the limitations in structural identification of large constructed structures. These limitations arise due to the geometric complexity, uncertain boundary and continuity conditions, loading environment, and the imperfect knowledge and errors in modeling such large constructed facilities. In this paper, the writers present their studies on developing a mixed microscopic-structural element level three-dimensional finite-element (FE) modeling of a long-span bridge structure and its structural system identification by integrating various experimental techniques. It is shown that a reasonable level of confidence (50–90%) can be achieved with a model that is calibrated using global and local structural monitoring data with a sufficiently high spatial resolution. The reliability of the global attributes, such as boundary and continuity conditions that may be identified and simulated by means of field-calibrated models using only dynamic test results (globally calibrated models), may appear to be high (as much as 90%). However, the reliability that should be expected for local stress fields is shown to be an entirely different matter, and a calibration based on just dynamic testing would be unable to reveal the confidence in simulated local responses. This is especially true for long-span bridges, because the resolutions of the dynamic test grids are often quite sparse due to the large size of the structures. In this paper, the writers illustrate that the density, modality, and bandwidth of experimental data should be carefully evaluated and matched to the size and complexity of a constructed system before claiming that a FE model is validated. It is also shown that even more than three dozen acceleration measurement points, two dozen strain measurements, and a continuous surveillance of wind and temperature were barely sufficient for a credible structural identification of a long-span bridge.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of Modal Flexibility for Damage Detection and Condition Assessment: Case Studies and Demonstrations on Large StructuresJournal of Structural Engineering, 2006
- Parameter Estimation for Multiple-Input Multiple-Output Modal Analysis of Large StructuresJournal of Engineering Mechanics, 2004
- Condition and Damage Assessment: Issues and Some Promising IndicesJournal of Structural Engineering, 2002
- Ambient Vibration of Long-Span Cable-Stayed BridgeJournal of Bridge Engineering, 2001
- Information technology and data management issues for health monitoring of the Commodore Barry BridgePublished by SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng ,2000
- Structural identification of Commodore Barry BridgePublished by SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng ,2000
- Dynamic Assessment of Curved Cable-Stayed Bridge by Model UpdatingJournal of Structural Engineering, 2000
- Structural Identification: Analytical AspectsJournal of Structural Engineering, 1998
- Structural Identification for Condition Assessment: Experimental ArtsJournal of Structural Engineering, 1997
- System Identification Approach to Detection of Structural ChangesJournal of Engineering Mechanics, 1991