The Development of Measures of Faculty Scholarship
- 1 March 1992
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Group & Organization Management
- Vol. 17 (1), 5-23
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601192171002
Abstract
Comprehensive and valid measures for evaluating faculty scholarship are needed for two main purposes: appraising the performance of individual faculty and rating business schools and departments. This study reports a methodology for assessing faculty scholarship that, it is argued, represents an improvement over previous approaches. Three sources of scholarship information (articles, citations, and peer ratings) were obtained on each of 2,229 faculty in 32 business schools. The three measures of scholarship were significantly but not perfectly correlated, indicating that combining the three measures would yield a more comprehensive index of scholarship than any one measure alone. Scholarship measures were obtained for faculty in five areas or departments (accounting, finance, management science and statistics, management, and marketing). The effect of weighting for department size was substantial, but the effect of differentially weighting the three components of scholarship was not. The implications for faculty performance appraisal as well as department and business school appraisals are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- PUBLICATION IN LEADING MANAGEMENT JOURNALS AS A MEASURE OF INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY.The Academy of Management Journal, 1988
- The Publishing Performance of U.S. Ph.D. Programs in Economics during the 1970sThe Journal of Human Resources, 1986
- An Evaluation of 50 "Ranked" Economics Departments: By Quantity and Quality of Faculty Publications and Graduate Student Placement and Research SuccessSouthern Economic Journal, 1985
- The Relative Importance of Journals Used in Management Research: An Alternative RankingHuman Relations, 1985
- EVALUATING THE MANAGEMENT JOURNALS: A SECOND LOOK.The Academy of Management Journal, 1984