Understanding Bibliometric Parameters and Analysis
Top Cited Papers
- 1 May 2015
- journal article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in RadioGraphics
- Vol. 35 (3), 736-746
- https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2015140036
Abstract
Bibliometric parameters have become an important part of modern assessment of academic productivity. These parameters exist for the purpose of evaluating authors (publication count, citation count, h-index, m-quotient, hc-index, e-index, g-index, i-10 [i-n] index) and journals (impact factor, Eigenfactor, article influence score, SCImago journal rank, source-normalized impact per paper). Although in recent years there has been a proliferation of bibliometric parameters, the true meaning and appropriate use of these parameters is generally not well understood. Effective use of existing and emerging bibliometric tools can aid in assessment of academic productivity, including readiness for promotions and other awards. However, if not properly understood, the data can be misinterpreted and may be subject to manipulation. Familiarity with bibliometric parameters will aid in their effective implementation in the review of authors-whether individuals or groups-and journals, as well as their possible use in the promotions review process, maximizing the effectiveness of bibliometric analysis.Keywords
This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is NIH funding predictive of greater research productivity and impact among academic otolaryngologists?The Laryngoscope, 2012
- The H-Index in Academic RadiologyAcademic Radiology, 2010
- The e-Index, Complementing the h-Index for Excess CitationsPLOS ONE, 2009
- The Eigenfactor™ Metrics: Figure 1.Journal of Neuroscience, 2008
- Does the h index have predictive power?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007
- Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networksScientometrics, 2007
- Theory and practise of the g-indexScientometrics, 2006
- An index to quantify an individual's scientific research outputProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005
- The scientific literature in diagnostic radiology for American readers: a survey and analysis of journals, papers, and authorsAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1986
- Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal EvaluationScience, 1972