Rose's population strategy of prevention need not increase social inequalities in health
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 3 November 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in International Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 39 (2), 372-377
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyp315
Abstract
Geoffrey Rose's 1985 paper, Sick individuals and sick populations, continues to spark debate and discussion. Since this original publication, there have been two notable challenges to Rose's population strategy of prevention. First, identification of high-risk individuals has improved considerably in accuracy, which some believe obviates the need for population-wide prevention strategies. Secondly, and more recently, it has been suggested that population strategies of prevention may inadvertently worsen social inequalities in health. We argue that population prevention will not necessarily worsen social inequalities in health, and the likelihood of it doing so will depend on whether the prevention strategy is more structural (targets conditions in which behaviours occur) or agentic (targets behaviour change among individuals) in nature. Also, there are potential drawbacks of approaches that focus on discrete populations (i.e. high risk or vulnerable) that need to be considered when selecting a strategy. Although Rose's ideas need to be continually scrutinized, his population strategy of prevention still holds considerable merit for improving population health and narrowing social inequalities in health.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Population Health and the Hardcore Smoker: Geoffrey Rose RevisitedJournal of Public Health Policy, 2008
- Sick individuals and sick populations: 20 years laterJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2006
- Evaluating the impact of population and high-risk strategies for the primary prevention of cardiovascular diseaseEuropean Heart Journal, 2004
- Commentary: Causes of incidence and causes of cases—a Durkheimian perspective on RoseInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2001
- Commentary: a radical future for public health.International Journal of Epidemiology, 2001
- Commentary: the prevention paradox in lay epidemiology--Rose revisited.International Journal of Epidemiology, 2001
- Commentary: Sick populations and sick individualsInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2001
- Population-Based Prevention of Eating Disorders: An Application of the Rose Prevention ModelPreventive Medicine, 2001
- Can a decline in the population means of cardiovascular risk factors reduce the number of people at risk?Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2001
- Sick Individuals and Sick PopulationsInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1985