Effect of test position on pelvic floor muscle assessment
- 5 October 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in International Urogynecology Journal
- Vol. 17 (4), 365-371
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-005-0016-3
Abstract
The aims of this study were to analyse the effect of different body positions on pelvic floor muscle (PFM) assessment using digital muscle testing, manometry and transabdominal ultrasound. In addition, subject acceptance of each testing position was recorded. Subjects were 20 women's health physiotherapists. The testing protocol included the best of three maximum voluntary contractions tested in each of four positions (crook lying, supine, sitting and standing). Significant differences in muscle strength and subject acceptance between positions were found with each tool, most often between lying and upright positions. Digital muscle testing and vaginal squeeze-pressure scores were highest in the lying position, and vaginal resting pressure and transabdominal ultrasound scores were highest in the standing position. Subjects preferred the lying positions for internal examinations. The clinical significance of these differences and the reasons for these variations require further investigation.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reliability of pelvic floor muscle strength assessment using different test positions and toolsNeurourology and Urodynamics, 2005
- Does the size of the vaginal probe affect measurement of pelvic floor muscle strength?Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2005
- Physiotherapy for female stress urinary incontinence: Individual therapy at the outpatient clinic versus home‐based pelvic floor training: A 5‐year follow‐up studyNeurourology and Urodynamics, 2004
- The effect of aging on the electromyographic activity of pelvic floor muscles: A comparative study among stress incontinent patients and asymptomatic womenMaturitas, 2003
- Vaginal palpation of pelvic floor muscle strength: inter‐test reproducibility and comparison between palpation and vaginal squeeze pressureActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2001
- Contraction of the pelvic floor muscles during abdominal maneuversArchives Of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2001
- The Influence of Posture on Perineal Ultrasound Imaging ParametersInternational Urogynecology Journal, 2001
- Evaluation of Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength Using Four Different TechniquesInternational Urogynecology Journal, 2001
- The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunctionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996
- Pelvic floor muscle exercise for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: II. Validity of vaginal pressure measurements of pelvic floor muscle strength and the necessity of supplementary methods for control of correct contractionNeurourology and Urodynamics, 1990