Live feeds for early stages of fish rearing
Top Cited Papers
- 15 April 2010
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Hindawi Limited in Aquaculture Research
- Vol. 41 (5), 613-640
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2009.02242.x
Abstract
Despite the recent progress in the production of inert diets for fish larvae, feeding of most species of interest for aquaculture still relies on live feeds during the early life stages. Independently of their nutritional value, live feeds are easily detected and captured, due to their swimming movements in the water column, and highly digestible, given their lower nutrient concentration (water content > 80%). The present paper reviews the main types of live feeds used in aquaculture, their advantages and pitfalls, with a special emphasis on their nutritional value and the extent to which this can be manipulated. The most commonly used live feeds in aquaculture are rotifers (Brachionus sp.) and brine shrimp (Artemia sp.), due to the existence of standardized cost-effective protocols for their mass production. However, both rotifers and Artemia have nutritional deficiencies for marine species, particularly in essential n-3 highly unsaturated fatty acids (HUFA, e.g., docosahexaenoic acid and eicosapentaenoic acid). Enrichment of these live feeds with HUFA-rich lipid emulsions may lead to an excess dietary lipid and sub-optimal dietary protein content for fish larvae. In addition, rotifers and Artemia are likely to have sub-optimal dietary levels of some amino acids, vitamins and minerals, at least for some species. Several species of microalgae are also used in larviculture. These are used as feed for other live feeds, but mostly in the 'green water' technique in fish larval rearing, with putative beneficial effects on feeding behaviour, digestive function, nutritional value, water quality and microflora. Copepods and other natural zooplankton organisms have also been used as live feeds, normally with considerably better results in terms of larval survival rates, growth and quality, when compared with rotifers and Artemia. Nonetheless, technical difficulties in mass-producing these organisms are still a constraint to their routine use. Improvements in inert microdiets will likely lead to a progressive substitution of live feeds. However, complete substitution is probably years away for most species, at least for the first days of feeding.This publication has 217 references indexed in Scilit:
- Association of Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor and O139 Bengal with the Copepods Acartia tonsa and Eurytemora affinisApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 2007
- Nutritional enrichment of larval fish feed with thraustochytrid producing polyunsaturated fatty acids and xanthophyllsJournal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 2007
- Global isolation by distance despite strong regional phylogeography in a small metazoanBMC Evolutionary Biology, 2007
- Quorum Sensing-Disrupting Brominated Furanones Protect the Gnotobiotic Brine Shrimp Artemia franciscana from Pathogenic Vibrio harveyi , Vibrio campbellii , and Vibrio parahaemolyticus IsolatesApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 2006
- Protein content and amino acid composition of the live feed rotifer (Brachionus plicatilis): With emphasis on the water soluble fractionAquaculture, 2006
- Advances in rearing cobia Rachycentron canadum larvae in recirculating aquaculture systems: Live prey enrichment and greenwater cultureAquaculture, 2005
- The effect of graded concentrations of dietary DHA on growth, survival and tissue fatty acid profile of Senegal sole (Solea senegalensis) larvae during the Artemia feeding periodAquaculture, 2005
- Nutritional effects of algal addition in first-feeding of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.) larvaeAquaculture, 1993
- A study of the variations in lipid levels, lipid class composition and fatty acid composition in the first stages ofArtemia sp.Marine Biology, 1991
- Body size variation among strains of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilisAquaculture, 1984