The Empirical Basis for Determinations of Medical Futility
Open Access
- 20 July 2010
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Vol. 25 (10), 1083-1089
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1445-3
Abstract
Decisions to limit treatment in critically ill patients often rely on publications that make claims of futility based on outcome data. Our objective was to systematically review the criteria for futility and the strength of empirical evidence across clinical studies that purport to support or refute claims of futility. The MEDLINE database was searched for relevant articles published between1980 and 2008. Selected studies reported original outcome data in critically ill or cardiac arrest patients and claimed that these data can support or refute decisions to limit treatment in comparable patients. Two authors independently abstracted data on patient characteristics, intervention, outcomes, cost, and design. Forty seven studies supporting a claim of futility and 45 refuting it were reviewed. Median point estimate for adverse outcome in studies supporting claims of futility was 100% (range 75% to 100%); median lower 95% confidence limit was 91% (range 48% to 99%). Explicit thresholds for futility were missing in 88% of articles. The original criteria for quantitative futility were fulfilled by only 28% of data, and almost exclusively in studies of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for cardiac arrest. Substantial statistical overlap was observed between data brought in support of futility claims and data brought to refute them. Most studies that purport to guide determinations of futility are based on insufficient data to provide statistical confidence for clinical decision-making. They usually lack explicit a priori thresholds for determination of futility. Many studies draw disparate conclusions based on statistically similar data. In most circumstances these problems preclude confident determinations of futility.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Independent Evaluation of an Out‐of‐hospital Termination of Resuscitation (TOR) Clinical Decision RuleAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2008
- When is critical care medicine cost-effective? A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness literature*Critical Care Medicine, 2006
- Traumatic Cardiac Arrest: Who Are the Survivors?Annals of Emergency Medicine, 2006
- Additional evidence in support of withholding or terminating cardiopulmonary resuscitation for trauma patients in the fieldJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2004
- 'At least we do not feel guilty': Managing conflict with families over dialysis discontinuationAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 1998
- Ruptured aortic aneurysm: Early postoperative prediction of mortality using an organ system failure scoreBritish Journal of Surgery, 1994
- Prolonged resuscitation efforts for cardiac arrest patients who cannot be resuscitated at the scene: Who is likely to benefit?Annals of Emergency Medicine, 1993
- PREHOSPITAL TRAUMATIC CARDIAC ARRESTThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 1993
- The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of ChoiceScience, 1981