China’s response to a national land-system sustainability emergency
Top Cited Papers
- 11 July 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Nature
- Vol. 559 (7713), 193-204
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0280-2
Abstract
China has responded to a national land-system sustainability emergency via an integrated portfolio of large-scale programmes. Here we review 16 sustainability programmes, which invested US$378.5 billion (in 2015 US$), covered 623.9 million hectares of land and involved over 500 million people, mostly since 1998. We find overwhelmingly that the interventions improved the sustainability of China’s rural land systems, but the impacts are nuanced and adverse outcomes have occurred. We identify some key characteristics of programme success, potential risks to their durability, and future research needs. We suggest directions for China and other nations as they progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations’ Agenda 2030.Keywords
This publication has 124 references indexed in Scilit:
- How Sustainable Is Government-Sponsored Desertification Rehabilitation in China? Behavior of Households to Changes in Environmental PoliciesPLOS ONE, 2013
- Use of exotic species during ecological restoration can produce effects that resemble vegetation invasions and other unintended consequencesEcological Engineering, 2013
- Effects of grassland restoration programs on ecosystems in arid and semiarid ChinaJournal of Environmental Management, 2013
- Water Sustainability for China and BeyondScience, 2012
- China's new forests aren't as green as they seemNature, 2011
- Impacts of the Natural Forest Conservation Program on the livelihoods of residents of Northwestern China: Perceptions of residents affected by the programEcological Economics, 2010
- Linking social norms to efficient conservation investment in payments for ecosystem servicesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009
- Development and testing of a sustainable environmental restoration policy on eradicating the poverty trap in China's Changting CountyProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009
- Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China's policies for ecosystem servicesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008
- China's ecological rehabilitation: Unprecedented efforts, dramatic impacts, and requisite policiesEcological Economics, 2006