Academic Impact of a Public Electronic Health Database: Bibliometric Analysis of Studies Using the General Practice Research Database
Open Access
- 22 June 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 6 (6), e21404
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021404
Abstract
Studies that use electronic health databases as research material are getting popular but the influence of a single electronic health database had not been well investigated yet. The United Kingdom's General Practice Research Database (GPRD) is one of the few electronic health databases publicly available to academic researchers. This study analyzed studies that used GPRD to demonstrate the scientific production and academic impact by a single public health database. A total of 749 studies published between 1995 and 2009 with ‘General Practice Research Database’ as their topics, defined as GPRD studies, were extracted from Web of Science. By the end of 2009, the GPRD had attracted 1251 authors from 22 countries and been used extensively in 749 studies published in 193 journals across 58 study fields. Each GPRD study was cited 2.7 times by successive studies. Moreover, the total number of GPRD studies increased rapidly, and it is expected to reach 1500 by 2015, twice the number accumulated till the end of 2009. Since 17 of the most prolific authors (1.4% of all authors) contributed nearly half (47.9%) of GPRD studies, success in conducting GPRD studies may accumulate. The GPRD was used mainly in, but not limited to, the three study fields of “Pharmacology and Pharmacy”, “General and Internal Medicine”, and “Public, Environmental and Occupational Health”. The UK and United States were the two most active regions of GPRD studies. One-third of GRPD studies were internationally co-authored. A public electronic health database such as the GPRD will promote scientific production in many ways. Data owners of electronic health databases at a national level should consider how to reduce access barriers and to make data more available for research.This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation IndexScientometrics, 2010
- Validity of diagnostic coding within the General Practice Research Database: a systematic reviewBritish Journal of General Practice, 2010
- Prospective Drug Safety Monitoring Using the UK Primary-Care General Practice Research DatabaseDrug Safety, 2010
- Broadening access to electronic healthcare databasesNature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2010
- Validation and validity of diagnoses in the General Practice Research Database: a systematic reviewBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2009
- A Comparison of Cost Effectiveness Using Data from Randomized Trials or Actual Clinical Practice: Selective Cox-2 Inhibitors as an ExamplePLoS Medicine, 2009
- Review on use of German health insurance medication claims data for epidemiological researchPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2009
- The state of h index researchEMBO Reports, 2008
- Increasing Levels of Restriction in Pharmacoepidemiologic Database Studies of Elderly and Comparison With Randomized Trial ResultsMedical Care, 2007
- Studying Prescription Drug Use and Outcomes With Medicaid Claims DataMedical Care, 2007