Water quality benchmarking (WQB) and priority control screening (PCS) of persistent toxic substances (PTSs) in China: Necessity, method and a case study
- 1 February 2014
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Science of The Total Environment
- Vol. 472, 1108-1120
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.119
Abstract
The priority control screening (PCS) and water quality benchmarking (WQB) of toxic chemicals in water are key steps to ensure the safety of drinking water and aquatic ecosystem that is the crucial goal of water environment management. Owing to the different levels of social-economic development in different countries and regions, the PCS and WQB of toxic chemicals must be determined in accordance with their specific water environment situations. However, in China, the PCS and WQB of toxic chemicals in water were mainly introduced from the other countries. A method for the PCS and WQB of toxic chemicals in water based on the ecological risks was proposed, and a platform named Bayesian Matbugs Calculator (BMC) was developed. As a case study, the WQB and PCS of sixty-nine PTSs based their ecological risks were performed on the basis of one-year monthly monitoring in Lake Chaohu. The results showed that the current national water quality criteria (WQC) would underestimate the toxicological risk to organisms in this aquatic ecosystem. It appears necessary to develop new WQC for the protection of aquatic organisms in Lake Chaohu. Four grades of priority control chemicals (PCCs) in Lake Chaohu were proposed. The highest priority was assigned to organonitrogen-phosphorus pesticides, including parathion, dichlorvos, malathion, omethoate, and di-n-butyl phthalate. However, the national "blacklist" of toxic compounds only covered 7 of 20 PCCs, indicating that the other 13 PCCs would not be controlled efficiently. Because the pollution pattern of PTSs in various water bodies might be quite different, we appealed to the governments to screen the regional PPC lists or develop a more comprehensive national list for aquatic ecosystem protection in China.Keywords
Funding Information
- Key Project of the National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (41030529)
- National Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars (40725004)
- National Project for Water Pollution Control (2008ZX07103-005-01)
- Ministry of Environmental Protection (201009032)
- Ministry of Education (20100001110035)
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Residues, Distributions, Sources, and Ecological Risks of OCPs in the Water from Lake Chaohu, ChinaThe Scientific World Journal, 2012
- China Embarking on Development of its Own National Water Quality Criteria SystemEnvironmental Science & Technology, 2010
- Ecological risk assessment in the United States environmental protection agency: A historical overviewIntegrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2008
- The usefulness of the bioconcentration factor as a tool for priority setting in chemicals controlToxicology Letters, 2007
- A framework for prioritizing fragrance materials for aquatic risk assessmentEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2002
- Determining probable causes of ecological impairment in the Little Scioto River, Ohio, USA: Part 1. Listing candidate causes and analyzing evidenceEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2002
- Estimation of exposure criteria values for biliary polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon metabolite concentrations in white suckers (Catostomus commersoni)Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2000
- Priority setting for existing chemicals: European Union risk ranking methodEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 1999
- A screening method for ranking and scoring chemicals by potential human health and environmental impactsEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 1997
- Priority ranking of chemicals for risk assessmentScience of The Total Environment, 1990