The Influence of Federal Spending on Presidential Elections
- 21 May 2012
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 106 (2), 348-366
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055412000159
Abstract
Do voters reward presidents for increased federal spending in their local constituencies? Previous research on the electoral consequences of federal spending has focused almost exclusively on Congress, mostly with null results. However, in a county- and individual-level study of presidential elections from 1988 to 2008, we present evidence that voters reward incumbent presidents (or their party's nominee) for increased federal spending in their communities. This relationship is stronger in battleground states. Furthermore, we show that federal grants are an electoral currency whose value depends on both the clarity of partisan responsibility for its provision and the characteristics of the recipients. Presidents enjoy increased support from spending in counties represented by co-partisan members of Congress. At the individual level, we also find that ideology conditions the response of constituents to spending; liberal and moderate voters reward presidents for federal spending at higher levels than conservatives. Our results suggest that, although voters may claim to favor deficit reduction, presidents who deliver such benefits are rewarded at the ballot box.Keywords
This publication has 81 references indexed in Scilit:
- Irrelevant events affect voters' evaluations of government performanceProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010
- The Effect of Electoral Geography on Pork Barreling in Bicameral LegislaturesAmerican Journal of Political Science, 2010
- The Senate Electoral Cycle and Bicameral Appropriations PoliticsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 2009
- Does Presidential Primary and Caucus Order Affect Policy? Evidence from Federal Procurement SpendingPolitical Research Quarterly, 2009
- The Electoral Benefits of Distributive SpendingPolitical Research Quarterly, 2009
- Attributing Blame: The Public's Response to Hurricane KatrinaThe Journal of Politics, 2008
- The Electoral Cost of War: Iraq Casualties and the 2004 U.S. Presidential ElectionThe Journal of Politics, 2007
- War Casualties, Policy Positions, and the Fate of LegislatorsPolitical Research Quarterly, 2004
- The Congressional Pork Barrel in a Republican EraThe Journal of Politics, 2000
- Deficits, Democrats, and Distributive Benefits: Congressional Elections and the Pork Barrel in the 1980sPolitical Research Quarterly, 1997